Why would you want anything to be produced inside your body triggered by a thing with which you were not born?
Analogous or not, irrelevant. It is completely irrelevant what this thing makes you to produce.
You are born as a 100% complete mechanism. Everything is in its place, doing its work, performing its role. No redundancy, no excess, no shortages. You are exactly as you should be.
Every cell of your body is 100% time occupied with what it does. No room for extracurricular activities.
And now you inject an “instruction” for ALL cells of your body to stop doing what they are doing and start producing something else. It is the maximum unimaginable stupidity, beyond any limits of fantasy. No matter how “scientifically” you name it, no matter how may “scientists” you will pay to “prove” the point. It’s way beyond stupidity - if you are not a believer, particularly.
If you declare believing in God, of any name, of any tradition - these injections, this mechanism, are a direct cancellation of your faith, of your religious beliefs, of the spiritual essence of your life. You are saying to God: “Your creation is defective. It doesn’t need what You did, our scientists know better than You.”
As MD wrote, accidental mistranslations happen all the time. That's the cause of most early miscarriages; the body recognizing it screwed up and getting rid of the mess. But I agree with you: why introduce something foreign with the potential to screw you up?
I tried looking up in particular what the error rate is, but one introduction to this Nature study suggests the following (which I haven't verified):
" The next step in gene expression, protein synthesis, offers the greatest opportunity for errors, with mistranslation events routinely occurring at a frequency of ~1 per 10,000 mRNA codons translated 8 (Fig. 1).
An error rate of 10–4 during protein synthesis equates to around 15% of all proteins in the cell containing at least one misincorporated amino acid under optimal growth conditions9,10. While the elevated error rates observed during protein synthesis can in part be attributed to the complexity of translating mRNA into protein,
as the ribosome must select the correct aminoacyl-transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) from a large pool of near-cognate substrates fast enough to sustain an elongation rate of 10–20 amino acids per second11–13, there are mechanisms that exist at multiple checkpoints during protein synthesis to minimize the frequency of translational errors. However, when compared to earlier steps during gene expression, error rates remain relatively high. This raises the questions of why cells appear to be more tolerant of errors at the level of protein synthesis, and could such errors be directly or indirectly beneficial in
It's a bit long, but it suggests that protein mistranslations occur often enough that there may be an evolutionary reason for it. But it's more to point out that mistranslation can occur more commonly than we would assume. Again, haven't verified this idea.
As to miscarriages I perused a few articles to see what there could be, and it appears that some people may be arguing ER stress related to senescence and the increase in misfolded proteins may be associated with certain miscarriages:
I would assume that the mistranslated proteins would have be related to mechanisms involved in gestation/pregnancy rather than these proteins from the vaccine in particular.
I guess, the body is in the constant search for the best optimized way of existing, at the least expenditure of energy (common sense). What scientists see as “errors” or “accidents”, may in fact be attempts at low-level (meaning: not threatening the functioning of the organism) modifications. It certainly happens in sports people, when we learn to do new things, in the best (optimized) way possible. Again, common sense, there must be ad hoc modifications - tested-proven-adopted or rejected. Otherwise, how would you go from 15 breaths per minute to 5?
Body weight loss or increase certainly affects all cells, as they all will have to adapt qualitatively to the new functioning. Daily (natural) changes in hydration will have the same effect. A one-minute fight with a partner - the same (or stronger :-)).
The nature is amazing. We will never create anything comparable.
"You are born as a 100% complete mechanism. Everything is in its place, doing its work, performing its role. No redundancy, no excess, no shortages. You are exactly as you should be.
Every cell of your body is 100% time occupied with what it does. No room for extracurricular activities."
One criticism I will argue (albeit from an uninformed position) is that our bodies aren't actually perfect. Otherwise, we wouldn't have issues regarding cancer, autoimmunity, or allergies. It seems that there's a growing trend to argue that our bodies are perfect at what it does, when instead I would argue that our bodies do well enough to keep us alive. It's sort of the pinnacle of adequacy rather than perfection, because our bodies mess up many times. Supposedly most of the proteins that our bodies produce are misfolded, and so our cells are essentially wasting time creating things that aren't usable, but we still continue to live on because our bodies haven't screwed up enough that all of this becomes dangerous.
It doesn't mean that the vaccines aren't harmful or shouldn't be scrutinized because there's a lot here about then that needs investigating. It's more that I wouldn't argue a model of cellular/human perfection as a valid rebuttal since our bodies aren't perfect machines.
This. Even though our bodies are not perfect, there is a balance that has been established within us and between us and the other organisms that share the planet with us, and anything that can overdue that balance that, despite the insistence of the medical industry, we really do not understand very well should be conducted with utmost caution and only in the direst circumstances.
I, for one, do not regard my body as a ticking time bomb of cancer and death that requires constant medical surveillance and tinkering to stay alive, and I am doing fine. Even if I died tomorrow, even if the thing that kills me could have been prevented by regular worship at the alter of medical science, I have no regrets and that would not discredit my philosophy, because that philosophy is that I lived free and without fear (or on a diet of 10+ different largely unnecessary Rx a day) and I died with grace at my appointed time,as will we all no matter how much medical intervention we seek. Medical science cannot make you immortal, and even if it could...would you really want to live that way?
And I'm an atheist. It is possible to accept the reality of existence and death and the balance of the natural world without religion, and it is possible for atheists and those of faith to agree on the point that the excesses of the scientific industries are becoming a complete abomination.
The claim that the malfunctions of translations are harmless, or have no known harm, was probably needed to get the study published. I expect for this to happen a lot, in order to get the data and results out there.
Probably, but it doesn't change the fact that we don't know what all of this means, although the precautionary principle would warrant hesitation in times of uncertainty rather than proclaiming "safe and effective".
It's so much worse than a false optimism, though. Odd patterns of mandates vs exemptions have appeared, as well as odd deaths of particular heads of state, all producing extra electricity and inspiration for tin foil hats.
NZ had severe mandates, and 11 thousand special exemptions. Things are getting interesting in Italy where the health minister is accused of murder for pushing the jabs with knowledge of their hazards, and in the Philippines where investigations into the "safe and effective" jabs have been approved by their legislature.
It’s been reported other vaxxes are causing allergies, etc. So why not the Covid vax doing that too? Why are many people on Twitter and Utube playing this as a “big nothing burger”?
Are junk antibodies being made specific to the junk protein products? Regardless…. It must at a minimum be causing inflammation? That can’t be minimalized as nothing.
I wasn't sure if I referred to allergies in my article and had to check. If the argument is that these off-proteins may be causing allergies that's a possibility but it remains a supposition.
I had a prior article on alpha-gal and it appears that most people produce an immune response to red meat, but it's possible that tick bites induce an IgE response which causes the allergic reactions. Honestly, the media seems to be working on overdrive for the fear porn.
As to junk antibodies or inflammation all of this can be occurring irrespective of vaccines, so it's not necessarily that these vaccines may induce inflammation or junk antibodies but compared to what normally occurs how problematic would this be?
Why would you want anything to be produced inside your body triggered by a thing with which you were not born?
Analogous or not, irrelevant. It is completely irrelevant what this thing makes you to produce.
You are born as a 100% complete mechanism. Everything is in its place, doing its work, performing its role. No redundancy, no excess, no shortages. You are exactly as you should be.
Every cell of your body is 100% time occupied with what it does. No room for extracurricular activities.
And now you inject an “instruction” for ALL cells of your body to stop doing what they are doing and start producing something else. It is the maximum unimaginable stupidity, beyond any limits of fantasy. No matter how “scientifically” you name it, no matter how may “scientists” you will pay to “prove” the point. It’s way beyond stupidity - if you are not a believer, particularly.
If you declare believing in God, of any name, of any tradition - these injections, this mechanism, are a direct cancellation of your faith, of your religious beliefs, of the spiritual essence of your life. You are saying to God: “Your creation is defective. It doesn’t need what You did, our scientists know better than You.”
As MD wrote, accidental mistranslations happen all the time. That's the cause of most early miscarriages; the body recognizing it screwed up and getting rid of the mess. But I agree with you: why introduce something foreign with the potential to screw you up?
I tried looking up in particular what the error rate is, but one introduction to this Nature study suggests the following (which I haven't verified):
" The next step in gene expression, protein synthesis, offers the greatest opportunity for errors, with mistranslation events routinely occurring at a frequency of ~1 per 10,000 mRNA codons translated 8 (Fig. 1).
An error rate of 10–4 during protein synthesis equates to around 15% of all proteins in the cell containing at least one misincorporated amino acid under optimal growth conditions9,10. While the elevated error rates observed during protein synthesis can in part be attributed to the complexity of translating mRNA into protein,
as the ribosome must select the correct aminoacyl-transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) from a large pool of near-cognate substrates fast enough to sustain an elongation rate of 10–20 amino acids per second11–13, there are mechanisms that exist at multiple checkpoints during protein synthesis to minimize the frequency of translational errors. However, when compared to earlier steps during gene expression, error rates remain relatively high. This raises the questions of why cells appear to be more tolerant of errors at the level of protein synthesis, and could such errors be directly or indirectly beneficial in
some cases?"
https://www.nature.com/articles/nmicrobiol2017117
It's a bit long, but it suggests that protein mistranslations occur often enough that there may be an evolutionary reason for it. But it's more to point out that mistranslation can occur more commonly than we would assume. Again, haven't verified this idea.
As to miscarriages I perused a few articles to see what there could be, and it appears that some people may be arguing ER stress related to senescence and the increase in misfolded proteins may be associated with certain miscarriages:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8247570/
It seems like some research has been involved around looking at senescence as a factor in miscarriages.
AHA. You mentioned miscarriages as an example … but…..
Is it possible that this is what is contributing to reported increase in miscarriages after mothers got vaxxed?
I would assume that the mistranslated proteins would have be related to mechanisms involved in gestation/pregnancy rather than these proteins from the vaccine in particular.
Sure, why not? And all the cancers in young people.
I guess, the body is in the constant search for the best optimized way of existing, at the least expenditure of energy (common sense). What scientists see as “errors” or “accidents”, may in fact be attempts at low-level (meaning: not threatening the functioning of the organism) modifications. It certainly happens in sports people, when we learn to do new things, in the best (optimized) way possible. Again, common sense, there must be ad hoc modifications - tested-proven-adopted or rejected. Otherwise, how would you go from 15 breaths per minute to 5?
Body weight loss or increase certainly affects all cells, as they all will have to adapt qualitatively to the new functioning. Daily (natural) changes in hydration will have the same effect. A one-minute fight with a partner - the same (or stronger :-)).
The nature is amazing. We will never create anything comparable.
"You are born as a 100% complete mechanism. Everything is in its place, doing its work, performing its role. No redundancy, no excess, no shortages. You are exactly as you should be.
Every cell of your body is 100% time occupied with what it does. No room for extracurricular activities."
One criticism I will argue (albeit from an uninformed position) is that our bodies aren't actually perfect. Otherwise, we wouldn't have issues regarding cancer, autoimmunity, or allergies. It seems that there's a growing trend to argue that our bodies are perfect at what it does, when instead I would argue that our bodies do well enough to keep us alive. It's sort of the pinnacle of adequacy rather than perfection, because our bodies mess up many times. Supposedly most of the proteins that our bodies produce are misfolded, and so our cells are essentially wasting time creating things that aren't usable, but we still continue to live on because our bodies haven't screwed up enough that all of this becomes dangerous.
It doesn't mean that the vaccines aren't harmful or shouldn't be scrutinized because there's a lot here about then that needs investigating. It's more that I wouldn't argue a model of cellular/human perfection as a valid rebuttal since our bodies aren't perfect machines.
This. Even though our bodies are not perfect, there is a balance that has been established within us and between us and the other organisms that share the planet with us, and anything that can overdue that balance that, despite the insistence of the medical industry, we really do not understand very well should be conducted with utmost caution and only in the direst circumstances.
I, for one, do not regard my body as a ticking time bomb of cancer and death that requires constant medical surveillance and tinkering to stay alive, and I am doing fine. Even if I died tomorrow, even if the thing that kills me could have been prevented by regular worship at the alter of medical science, I have no regrets and that would not discredit my philosophy, because that philosophy is that I lived free and without fear (or on a diet of 10+ different largely unnecessary Rx a day) and I died with grace at my appointed time,as will we all no matter how much medical intervention we seek. Medical science cannot make you immortal, and even if it could...would you really want to live that way?
And I'm an atheist. It is possible to accept the reality of existence and death and the balance of the natural world without religion, and it is possible for atheists and those of faith to agree on the point that the excesses of the scientific industries are becoming a complete abomination.
Add Dr Been to the list of folks covering this paper. He did a pretty good video last night on it.
https://www.youtube.com/live/BtiH5sfFklw?si=Ehl9HPQC2eQnFawd
Thanks for the link! I'll try watching when I get the chance and see what he thinks compared to my perspective.
Long video https://rumble.com/v40gi2c-environmental-super-prion-contamination-a-vaccine-threat-assessment.html
The claim that the malfunctions of translations are harmless, or have no known harm, was probably needed to get the study published. I expect for this to happen a lot, in order to get the data and results out there.
Probably, but it doesn't change the fact that we don't know what all of this means, although the precautionary principle would warrant hesitation in times of uncertainty rather than proclaiming "safe and effective".
It's so much worse than a false optimism, though. Odd patterns of mandates vs exemptions have appeared, as well as odd deaths of particular heads of state, all producing extra electricity and inspiration for tin foil hats.
NZ had severe mandates, and 11 thousand special exemptions. Things are getting interesting in Italy where the health minister is accused of murder for pushing the jabs with knowledge of their hazards, and in the Philippines where investigations into the "safe and effective" jabs have been approved by their legislature.
Hmmmmm…
The only increase in allergies has been the media giving attention to the increase in red meat allergies.
The allergy control Center says you can develop food allergies at any time of life and not necessarily related to the tick bite.
Is it as simple as people unknowingly have a mild meat allergy but after Covid it’s worse?
Found this Covid/alpha gal study. So something is going on? But what?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7675678/
It’s been reported other vaxxes are causing allergies, etc. So why not the Covid vax doing that too? Why are many people on Twitter and Utube playing this as a “big nothing burger”?
Are junk antibodies being made specific to the junk protein products? Regardless…. It must at a minimum be causing inflammation? That can’t be minimalized as nothing.
I wasn't sure if I referred to allergies in my article and had to check. If the argument is that these off-proteins may be causing allergies that's a possibility but it remains a supposition.
I had a prior article on alpha-gal and it appears that most people produce an immune response to red meat, but it's possible that tick bites induce an IgE response which causes the allergic reactions. Honestly, the media seems to be working on overdrive for the fear porn.
https://moderndiscontent.substack.com/p/to-have-the-alpha-gal-disease
As to junk antibodies or inflammation all of this can be occurring irrespective of vaccines, so it's not necessarily that these vaccines may induce inflammation or junk antibodies but compared to what normally occurs how problematic would this be?
Thanks for covering this 🙂(Merry Christmas 🎄) https://rumble.com/v405dnj-unanticipated-complications-with-mrna-vaccine.html
Thank you for giving us the skinny on this study.
Wishing you a lovely Christmas season. 🌲☃️💕
.
If A Vaccinated Person
Drops Dead In The Forest
...
.
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/quirks/trump-exits-paris-accord-finding-genes-linked-to-intelligence-and-more-1.4143218/scientists-using-crispr-discover-hundreds-of-unintended-mutations-1.4143238