So Dr Campbell says "the risk benefit analysis has dramatically changed" lol.
I haven't seen ARR of the "benefit" of the jabs preventing/reducing severe analysis before this, but now we see the man behind the curtain. Thank you so much for providing the RRR and the ARR from this study. ARR of a quarter of one percent! I never believed the mantra of "protection from severe illness and hospitalization" Grauchi et al promoted, plus 4 of 5 needing oxygen were vaccinated! and now I see that house of cards fallen down. Lies, lies and damned lies all along.
I think Dr. Campbell is one of those people who really tries to be careful in what he says, although he can sometimes be rather inconsistent, such as when he commented about that monkeypox study coming from a lab in Wuhan and arguing that Wuhan was researching monkeypox (as if to draw a situation to the current outbreak). So I think he's an interesting person who tries to look at some of the information, but may feel that tug to be a little clickbaity at times. It's a general shame because that's how you drive views to be quite honest.
I will admit my newfound ARR-self has become a bit overzealous. I think the Qatar study shouldn't have had the ARR, or the comparison at least because so many variables at play. This study was a little different because they used the Poisson regression which is additional variables factored into their calculations. So I just argued that I can use the population given at the end of the study figure, since that appears to be their final count and use the case numbers (assuming they were not relative to person-days).
Singapore is really interesting because they appear to have very low deaths from COVID, including none in children aside from the recent questionable deaths. It all just adds up to argue that the evidence is really not there to argue for the massive need to vaccinate, especially children with an outdated spike.
So Dr Campbell says "the risk benefit analysis has dramatically changed" lol.
I haven't seen ARR of the "benefit" of the jabs preventing/reducing severe analysis before this, but now we see the man behind the curtain. Thank you so much for providing the RRR and the ARR from this study. ARR of a quarter of one percent! I never believed the mantra of "protection from severe illness and hospitalization" Grauchi et al promoted, plus 4 of 5 needing oxygen were vaccinated! and now I see that house of cards fallen down. Lies, lies and damned lies all along.
Again, thanks for this review and analysis
I think Dr. Campbell is one of those people who really tries to be careful in what he says, although he can sometimes be rather inconsistent, such as when he commented about that monkeypox study coming from a lab in Wuhan and arguing that Wuhan was researching monkeypox (as if to draw a situation to the current outbreak). So I think he's an interesting person who tries to look at some of the information, but may feel that tug to be a little clickbaity at times. It's a general shame because that's how you drive views to be quite honest.
I will admit my newfound ARR-self has become a bit overzealous. I think the Qatar study shouldn't have had the ARR, or the comparison at least because so many variables at play. This study was a little different because they used the Poisson regression which is additional variables factored into their calculations. So I just argued that I can use the population given at the end of the study figure, since that appears to be their final count and use the case numbers (assuming they were not relative to person-days).
Singapore is really interesting because they appear to have very low deaths from COVID, including none in children aside from the recent questionable deaths. It all just adds up to argue that the evidence is really not there to argue for the massive need to vaccinate, especially children with an outdated spike.