A collection of posts about Catecholamines, factors that may contribute to their elevation, and why we should be careful about overlooking information for narrative's sake.
So the evidence does appear to suggest that there's been a big uptick in cardiovascular events and deaths among athletes.
My explanation here isn't intended to rule out the vaccines. Instead, it looks at the vaccines in a broader context given the fact that athletes are likely to not be as healthy as we make them out to be meaning that they are in a more vulnerable position for adverse reactions.
Let's say that at any given time that the risk for a cardiovascular event for an athlete is 1 in 10,000. However, the vaccine may elevate the risk and lead to 1 in 2,000. This certainly would be an uptick but let's say that for the average person the risk is 1 in 100,000 for a cardiovascular event (we're being very loose with numbers and what the event would be here).
Given these numbers we would argue that there is an uptick post vaccine rollout, however, athletes due to their behaviors and other factors that may make them unhealthy they are just in general more likely to be more susceptible than other individuals.
The intention of my post wasn't to downplay the issues with the vaccines but to say that a broader context is needed to figure out what exactly is happening. It doesn't help us when we argue that certain people are healthy aside from the jab if it means we don't look at other factors that are worth considering if one wants to reduce the risk or get to the facts.
I'm reading that the baseline for athletes suddenly dropping dead has been much higher than past year's numbers prior to the jab.
How can that be explained?
So the evidence does appear to suggest that there's been a big uptick in cardiovascular events and deaths among athletes.
My explanation here isn't intended to rule out the vaccines. Instead, it looks at the vaccines in a broader context given the fact that athletes are likely to not be as healthy as we make them out to be meaning that they are in a more vulnerable position for adverse reactions.
Let's say that at any given time that the risk for a cardiovascular event for an athlete is 1 in 10,000. However, the vaccine may elevate the risk and lead to 1 in 2,000. This certainly would be an uptick but let's say that for the average person the risk is 1 in 100,000 for a cardiovascular event (we're being very loose with numbers and what the event would be here).
Given these numbers we would argue that there is an uptick post vaccine rollout, however, athletes due to their behaviors and other factors that may make them unhealthy they are just in general more likely to be more susceptible than other individuals.
The intention of my post wasn't to downplay the issues with the vaccines but to say that a broader context is needed to figure out what exactly is happening. It doesn't help us when we argue that certain people are healthy aside from the jab if it means we don't look at other factors that are worth considering if one wants to reduce the risk or get to the facts.