Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Modern Discontent's avatar

So just in case people are misinterpreting this post:

I am not arguing that SARS-COV2 was not created via GOF research, or was NOT* bioengineered.

Rather, I am arguing that GOF has been widely thrown out and has become an umbrella term for any form of tinkering with a virus.

It's one thing if a virus was constructed (whether nefarious or done with "good intentions"), but it's another if ANY research that looks at mutations would be considered GOF and thus tossed in with questions on the origins of SARS-COV2.

For anyone who has been around on my Substack I've raised questions about SARS-COV2's origins, even if I wasn't one that questioned it originally. I also raised questions about Omicron's emergence as well.

*Not should have been included in the original comment to infer that my original comment does not infer SARS-COV2 was not bioengineered (i.e. that is still a likely possibility).

Expand full comment
Aimee's avatar

Pfizer didn’t deny it so … 🤷‍♀️

Expand full comment
43 more comments...

No posts