In contrast to prior hypotheses, a new study appears to suggest that inflammation and specific immune cells, rather than autoimmunity, may be responsible for myocarditis. Part I of Barmada, et al.
Or another take would be "one for X people, and one for Y people". Figuring out why some people respond differently is critical to making sense of everything going on.
With respect to the vaccines being banned, I would argue that we're at this point where such an argument may not help-we've already had hundreds of millions of people get the vaccine, so now I would argue it's a matter of figuring out everything we can. It's unfortunate that all of this wasn't done BEFORE the vaccine rollouts, because now all of this information coming out will be done in hindsight.
There is too much corralled science out there. Where scientists seem to select an hypothesis then go all out to prove it at all cost to be the overriding one.
They look for proof not truth.
Justification for their funding.
When they start to design their studies in awareness of the intertwining nature of nature? That’s when they will be taken seriously.
This topic came home for me today. I was talking with someone I know, older than me, and I happened to mention some things about the shots. And she happened to mentioned having received them -- the original series I believe (I try not to ask a lot of questions). And this was after mentioning her recently diagnosed heart disease that just seemed to come out of nowhere.
I keep saying, this is hard to watch. I can't be certain in every single instance, but the instances are mounting in my personal circle. The elderly are being utterly betrayed by people they trust.
Even now it's really hard to discern what exactly is happening. Over time I'm more inclined to think that a lot of these issues may be related to vascular issues that manifest as many of the other issues we are seeing. This is based on the fact that many of these findings appear to be related to blood vessels such as the tinnitus, cognitive impairment which is related to vascular function, the list can really go on. I've seen a number of people mentioning they know people who have vertigo or POTS now. This is actually one of the things I've seen more of than anything else, and it further highlights why this focus on the heart alone means that we may be boxing ourselves in to such a degree we may not figure out what is exactly happening.
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
I remember watching some DrBeen videos and him talking about antigen-antibody complexes and how in one study they did something to release all the bound antibodies in order to be able to measure them accurately- can’t remember what the study was though! Could the lower levels measured here in the carditis patients be because all their antibodies are strongly bound and therefore busy creating damage and not free to be measured? ( I haven’t read the study).
My kitten was diagnosed at 6 months of age with heart failure due to ‘transient myocardial thickening’ presumably from a vaccine ( given at 2 & 3 months) and had a raised troponin and white cells ( can’t remember which type). This was 2019. We also know the two vaccines suggested for smallpox/monkeypox last year have a high incidence of myocarditis. Does each individual vaccine have its own unique way of causing myocarditis or is there a common explanation for all?
I believe that was the adolescent study that was reported on by several people a few months ago. My take is below, and unfortunately the results are very interesting but didn't really elaborate much on what these findings could mean.
What this study revealed, however, is that measurements of antibodies may be confounded by the binding with spike. I generally would assume that serum samples would be treated to remove any bound antibodies prior to conducting assays, but then again there's a lot with respect to studies that seems to go against what should be done. 🤷♂️
One speculation that I can form from the study is that innate immune function may play a role in the myocarditis occurring, in that some children may have a bias towards innate immune responses which, when paired with some form of dysfunction or exposure to a ton of antigens, leads to the damaging response.
I believe you have mentioned that before Crosscat, and I'm sorry that happened. It does appear that vaccination with different antigens can lead to myocarditis. The question is whether the antigen/virus used shows some form of cardiotropism (targets the heart directly), or if the administration of the vaccine may be disjointed from typical exposure to the pathogen, and thus may be more reflective of antigen exposure in more severe diseased states (if that makes sense). There's plenty of factors that can contribute to myocarditis, and I think many scientists haven't done their due diligence to figure it out.
Would you like to contribute to Wholistic? It could just be having some portions of your articles reprinted on Wholistic and then linked out here for the full version, perhaps with a minor intro or paragraph rewrite to make it search engine friendly (i.e., not a total duplicate), and you'd get a byline on Wholistic? Let me know, thank you!
Oh, jeez! Sorry Stephanie I don't seem to receive comments. I completely missed this comment (I'm only seeing it now because Bret and Heather are covering this study). As to reprinting portions of my articles I have no issues so long as credit is given to the initial author. I'm finding that some people are nearing a form of plagiarism on some Substacks, which is rather scary.
Otherwise I have no issue. I already cite and include others in my posts! Again, sorry for not noticing this comment! There's a lot of old comments I don't notice until I look back at them.
My take:
(1) likely "any one of the above" across different individuals.
(2) Any way you look at it, THE JABS SHOULD BE BANNED WORLDWIDE.
Or another take would be "one for X people, and one for Y people". Figuring out why some people respond differently is critical to making sense of everything going on.
With respect to the vaccines being banned, I would argue that we're at this point where such an argument may not help-we've already had hundreds of millions of people get the vaccine, so now I would argue it's a matter of figuring out everything we can. It's unfortunate that all of this wasn't done BEFORE the vaccine rollouts, because now all of this information coming out will be done in hindsight.
There is too much corralled science out there. Where scientists seem to select an hypothesis then go all out to prove it at all cost to be the overriding one.
They look for proof not truth.
Justification for their funding.
When they start to design their studies in awareness of the intertwining nature of nature? That’s when they will be taken seriously.
It does, strangely, seem like this study was done as a rebuttal of prior hypotheses more than one constructed out of curiosity and scientific inquiry.
It may well be and is most probable.
But they follow the same principles that funding only comes from support of the narrative.
This topic came home for me today. I was talking with someone I know, older than me, and I happened to mention some things about the shots. And she happened to mentioned having received them -- the original series I believe (I try not to ask a lot of questions). And this was after mentioning her recently diagnosed heart disease that just seemed to come out of nowhere.
I keep saying, this is hard to watch. I can't be certain in every single instance, but the instances are mounting in my personal circle. The elderly are being utterly betrayed by people they trust.
Even now it's really hard to discern what exactly is happening. Over time I'm more inclined to think that a lot of these issues may be related to vascular issues that manifest as many of the other issues we are seeing. This is based on the fact that many of these findings appear to be related to blood vessels such as the tinnitus, cognitive impairment which is related to vascular function, the list can really go on. I've seen a number of people mentioning they know people who have vertigo or POTS now. This is actually one of the things I've seen more of than anything else, and it further highlights why this focus on the heart alone means that we may be boxing ourselves in to such a degree we may not figure out what is exactly happening.
I have an alternate view on lung physiology that dismisses the notion of oxygen and carbon dioxide gaseous exchange
The article is titled
We breathe air not oxygen
I take you though all the steps that lead to this statement
Including how oxygen is manufactured
How oxygen is calibrated
Eg medical oxygen has 67parts per million of water contamination
Why oxygen is toxic, dehydrates and damages the alveoli
Lung physiology requires the air at the alveoli to reach 100% humidity
Can you see the problem?
The new take on lung physiology:
The lungs rehydrate the passing RBCs with iso tonic saline solution as they pass through the alveoli capillary beds
RBCs change from dark contracted dehydrated to plump bright hydrated form as they soak up the iso tonic saline solution the bursting alveoli bubbles throw upon the capillary sac
The airway mucosa conditions the breathe with salt and moisture
Find the article
Jane333.Substack.com
I’m having trouble with the archive function
I intend for the article to be free to read
Here’s a link that hopefully works
https://open.substack.com/pub/jane333/p/we-breath-air-not-oxygen?utm_source=direct&r=ykfsh&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I remember watching some DrBeen videos and him talking about antigen-antibody complexes and how in one study they did something to release all the bound antibodies in order to be able to measure them accurately- can’t remember what the study was though! Could the lower levels measured here in the carditis patients be because all their antibodies are strongly bound and therefore busy creating damage and not free to be measured? ( I haven’t read the study).
My kitten was diagnosed at 6 months of age with heart failure due to ‘transient myocardial thickening’ presumably from a vaccine ( given at 2 & 3 months) and had a raised troponin and white cells ( can’t remember which type). This was 2019. We also know the two vaccines suggested for smallpox/monkeypox last year have a high incidence of myocarditis. Does each individual vaccine have its own unique way of causing myocarditis or is there a common explanation for all?
I believe that was the adolescent study that was reported on by several people a few months ago. My take is below, and unfortunately the results are very interesting but didn't really elaborate much on what these findings could mean.
https://moderndiscontent.substack.com/p/circulating-spike-in-post-vaccinated
What this study revealed, however, is that measurements of antibodies may be confounded by the binding with spike. I generally would assume that serum samples would be treated to remove any bound antibodies prior to conducting assays, but then again there's a lot with respect to studies that seems to go against what should be done. 🤷♂️
One speculation that I can form from the study is that innate immune function may play a role in the myocarditis occurring, in that some children may have a bias towards innate immune responses which, when paired with some form of dysfunction or exposure to a ton of antigens, leads to the damaging response.
I believe you have mentioned that before Crosscat, and I'm sorry that happened. It does appear that vaccination with different antigens can lead to myocarditis. The question is whether the antigen/virus used shows some form of cardiotropism (targets the heart directly), or if the administration of the vaccine may be disjointed from typical exposure to the pathogen, and thus may be more reflective of antigen exposure in more severe diseased states (if that makes sense). There's plenty of factors that can contribute to myocarditis, and I think many scientists haven't done their due diligence to figure it out.
Would you like to contribute to Wholistic? It could just be having some portions of your articles reprinted on Wholistic and then linked out here for the full version, perhaps with a minor intro or paragraph rewrite to make it search engine friendly (i.e., not a total duplicate), and you'd get a byline on Wholistic? Let me know, thank you!
Oh, jeez! Sorry Stephanie I don't seem to receive comments. I completely missed this comment (I'm only seeing it now because Bret and Heather are covering this study). As to reprinting portions of my articles I have no issues so long as credit is given to the initial author. I'm finding that some people are nearing a form of plagiarism on some Substacks, which is rather scary.
Otherwise I have no issue. I already cite and include others in my posts! Again, sorry for not noticing this comment! There's a lot of old comments I don't notice until I look back at them.