Thank you for the sentiments, it actually means a lot!
I usually don't read anything from the news because it's hard to see if they really know anything about the subjects. I wouldn't mind if it seems that they are trying in good-faith to learn some of the information, but instead it really just seems like they take information from other people or just rely on an "expert" to explain things to them instead of researching things for themselves.
Even within this realm I see this happening with people I agree with, so I want to show that making large, broad conclusions without really looking at any evidence is not the right approach to examining the science.
So I appreciate the comment, I'm trying to do my best and find some answers!
"Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread" -- 2005:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/
Thanks for that! And there's a few papers on HCQ against SARS-COV2 itself, so there is some evidence out there that helps argue at least trying it.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7054408/pdf/41422_2020_Article_282.pdf
Here's one of HCQ and Azithromycin:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7182748/
Very informative!
Many decades ago an article like this one, explaining to non-scientists how HCQ works would appear in a respected publication like NYT.
Our world would have been very different if MSM was doing actual journalism.
Thankfully now we have writers like you and hopefully more people discover your substack.
Thank you for the sentiments, it actually means a lot!
I usually don't read anything from the news because it's hard to see if they really know anything about the subjects. I wouldn't mind if it seems that they are trying in good-faith to learn some of the information, but instead it really just seems like they take information from other people or just rely on an "expert" to explain things to them instead of researching things for themselves.
Even within this realm I see this happening with people I agree with, so I want to show that making large, broad conclusions without really looking at any evidence is not the right approach to examining the science.
So I appreciate the comment, I'm trying to do my best and find some answers!