The way to gain trust is to not parrot obvious lies and to censor any information that makes it obvious that you are telling lies !
By spouting the exact same message worldwide and the news media not asking the obvious questions they managed to make " conspiracy theorists " out of a lot of people.
This was the most hamfisted operation I have ever seen, it was as if they wanted to look like useless idiots who had no idea what they were doing which of course they were !
Of course we are all to blame. We are the ones who allow this rubbish to happen in the first place by our complacency by letting the wrong people make our decisions for us.
Jun 23, 2023·edited Jun 23, 2023Liked by Modern Discontent
In all my years, I only remember once being asked to take a survey/poll. I don't really really believe any of them because it's just too easy too fake. "Recent poll shows..." Words, words, only words.
I somewhat recall, although maybe my memory is hazy, that in one of my psychology courses a professor made a comment that "those who respond to surveys are generally not the type you want responding to surveys". That is, they may respond due to some reason to wanting to be included. This was an issue with long COVID studies which all relied on surveys. If you ask someone to be included in a survey on long COVID you're bound to get anyone who thinks they may have something going on. Because of that, there's no way to accurately get a good background measure, so all of these Long COVID studies end up becoming a wash and many of these researchers just report that the groups are comparable.
Here, it's not quite the case given that the responses seem varied. However, I find it a bit disingenuous for them to ask questions and to have the researchers interpret the findings and categorizing them based on what they deem conspiratorial. I mean, they're saying that someone concerned about adverse reactions is being conspiratorial. That's pretty striking.
Oh, how I hate the made up word, misinformation. It is a weasel work used to call someone a liar and trying to avoid a lawsuit for libel and slander. When Hotez or CNN says RFK Jr. is spreading misinformation they are openly calling him a liar and should be sued for libel and slander.
Would it not be fun to force Hotez to describe a specific example of "misinformation" from a year ago in all of his media episodes for something now widely known to be true and then eviscerate him in court.
I was interpreting it from how the researchers are portraying the information, as in to infer that the most vaccine hesitant are far more impressionable and less educated (based on their perspective). It's one of the reasons I sort of roll my eyes at the categorization of "educated", because being educated certainly does not mean that one lacks intelligence, and it's very improper for these people to make that assumption in the paper.
Ordered nicotine losengesfor med chest.. Nicotine helps with hunger pains of the gov created food shortages and bonus nicotinr iis reported to unblock acetylcholine receptors experience from spike exposure (Dr Ardis theory & recent publication by military). Ardis reported the US gov is to restrict nicotine. The amts in products in an alcohol prohibition-era style gov restriction. Not sure the details, but sure to add to an angrier society the gov. indulges themselves with.
I've been a bit critical of Ardis in the past if I were to be frank. I find that he takes bits of information he finds and proposes a model or hypothesis, but doesn't spend time examining how things actually fit together. At least that's my perspective. I haven't seen his recent theory, but his snake venom hypothesis was very shaky in my opinion.
I too was skeptical. It seemed patients get their taste and smell and tinnitus helped by nicotine. And the idea that nicotine displaces spike from the acetylcholine receptor seem a possible mechanism. Don't know if cv or vax has homologies to venomous toxins like it has been reported to have homologies to gp120 and prions.
This recent ploy to label anyone that asks questions as being “anti science” is such an obvious straw man. It’s grammar school level logic used to push climate, health, trans policies that have limited scientific underpinnings but have broad ideological support. Regular people are beginning to see through this facade because it’s all so obviously phony, not because they are conspiracy theorists or because they consume news outside the mainstream.
Now we find ourselves in a world of zombies, mention the word vaccine and their eyes glaze over, the fight or flight response is triggered. They bolt or attack, blind to reason. Once their blood lust is satisfied the zombies retreat to the safety of the herd. A place with no questions and unchallenged beliefs they wallow in their ignorance.
The way to gain trust is to not parrot obvious lies and to censor any information that makes it obvious that you are telling lies !
By spouting the exact same message worldwide and the news media not asking the obvious questions they managed to make " conspiracy theorists " out of a lot of people.
This was the most hamfisted operation I have ever seen, it was as if they wanted to look like useless idiots who had no idea what they were doing which of course they were !
Of course we are all to blame. We are the ones who allow this rubbish to happen in the first place by our complacency by letting the wrong people make our decisions for us.
Yep all published articles are propaganda to maintain the hypnosis of the brainwashed participants.
In all my years, I only remember once being asked to take a survey/poll. I don't really really believe any of them because it's just too easy too fake. "Recent poll shows..." Words, words, only words.
I somewhat recall, although maybe my memory is hazy, that in one of my psychology courses a professor made a comment that "those who respond to surveys are generally not the type you want responding to surveys". That is, they may respond due to some reason to wanting to be included. This was an issue with long COVID studies which all relied on surveys. If you ask someone to be included in a survey on long COVID you're bound to get anyone who thinks they may have something going on. Because of that, there's no way to accurately get a good background measure, so all of these Long COVID studies end up becoming a wash and many of these researchers just report that the groups are comparable.
Here, it's not quite the case given that the responses seem varied. However, I find it a bit disingenuous for them to ask questions and to have the researchers interpret the findings and categorizing them based on what they deem conspiratorial. I mean, they're saying that someone concerned about adverse reactions is being conspiratorial. That's pretty striking.
Oh, how I hate the made up word, misinformation. It is a weasel work used to call someone a liar and trying to avoid a lawsuit for libel and slander. When Hotez or CNN says RFK Jr. is spreading misinformation they are openly calling him a liar and should be sued for libel and slander.
Would it not be fun to force Hotez to describe a specific example of "misinformation" from a year ago in all of his media episodes for something now widely known to be true and then eviscerate him in court.
After AstraZeneca was banned, the lower income vaccine hesitant increased their vaccine hesitancy...
...lower income definitely didn’t mean dumber
I was interpreting it from how the researchers are portraying the information, as in to infer that the most vaccine hesitant are far more impressionable and less educated (based on their perspective). It's one of the reasons I sort of roll my eyes at the categorization of "educated", because being educated certainly does not mean that one lacks intelligence, and it's very improper for these people to make that assumption in the paper.
Was kind of teasing, as “educated” are more likely to be less vaccine hesitant 🤪
It wasn’t banned, it was “temporarily suspended”. 😀
Wow…now even I want to take it more…it was probably more thoroughly tested🤪
Ordered nicotine losengesfor med chest.. Nicotine helps with hunger pains of the gov created food shortages and bonus nicotinr iis reported to unblock acetylcholine receptors experience from spike exposure (Dr Ardis theory & recent publication by military). Ardis reported the US gov is to restrict nicotine. The amts in products in an alcohol prohibition-era style gov restriction. Not sure the details, but sure to add to an angrier society the gov. indulges themselves with.
I've been a bit critical of Ardis in the past if I were to be frank. I find that he takes bits of information he finds and proposes a model or hypothesis, but doesn't spend time examining how things actually fit together. At least that's my perspective. I haven't seen his recent theory, but his snake venom hypothesis was very shaky in my opinion.
I too was skeptical. It seemed patients get their taste and smell and tinnitus helped by nicotine. And the idea that nicotine displaces spike from the acetylcholine receptor seem a possible mechanism. Don't know if cv or vax has homologies to venomous toxins like it has been reported to have homologies to gp120 and prions.
right on-same
.
The Vaccinated Are To Be Judged By The Sickness
Of Their Behavior In Society Among Us.
Their Physical Suffering Is Not The Issue.
Their Own Government
Used Their Own Minds Against Them.
If You're Not On That
Your Own Government
Will Continue To Use Them Against You.
.
This recent ploy to label anyone that asks questions as being “anti science” is such an obvious straw man. It’s grammar school level logic used to push climate, health, trans policies that have limited scientific underpinnings but have broad ideological support. Regular people are beginning to see through this facade because it’s all so obviously phony, not because they are conspiracy theorists or because they consume news outside the mainstream.
.
Dear Vaccine Injured Deniers
You Will Have To Forgive Me
For Not Completely Trusting Your Assesment.
.
Now we find ourselves in a world of zombies, mention the word vaccine and their eyes glaze over, the fight or flight response is triggered. They bolt or attack, blind to reason. Once their blood lust is satisfied the zombies retreat to the safety of the herd. A place with no questions and unchallenged beliefs they wallow in their ignorance.
More here; https://wakeuppeople.substack.com/p/the-psychological-war-in-your-mind