Thorough and useful information about remdesivir, especially since safe early protocols with Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and monoclonal antibodies are still running into hurdles.
Thank you. Hopefully this will make it easier for people to access and read. One of the weirdest things to see right is the demonization of monoclonal antibodies. Considering that PAXLOVID is intended to cost 700 dollars and antibodies are around 1k I find it hard to argue this is a money issue. I'm not sure where Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine will be come next year. They've been targeted so much as well they won't let anything come out of it. I would still like to see an Ivermectin/Ritonavir study or at least a valid pharmocological/toxicological reason as to why it would not be feasible.
I agree, I think it's incredibly strange as well. I think "they" don't want anything to be perceived as effective besides the vaccine. Or I also wonder if some of it has to do particularly with governor Ron DeSantis. He's been one of the greatest proponents of monoclonal antibodies, and I think the "powers that be" desperately don't want him to be successful in any way.
I agree with you about hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. No matter what studies come out, they both have negative connotations associated with them that might be hard for doctors to overcome, (in addition to the hospital protocols that forbid them). Unfortunately it seems to be less about settled or unsettled science, than about information and perception at this point. I wonder how we will look back on this 20 years from now, what the consensus will be.
Well recent information makes it seem as if there was a one-track mind to COVID and everything was put into vaccines. Now there are reports of possible shortages of monoclonal antibodies which would be devastating.
I would have to wonder how much of true science will be left after the pandemic ends (if it ever does). It's pretty upsetting that all of this is making me question how much science out there truly is science if it is most likely to be filtered through corporations and the "right" avenues before being presented to us.
Thorough and useful information about remdesivir, especially since safe early protocols with Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and monoclonal antibodies are still running into hurdles.
Thank you. Hopefully this will make it easier for people to access and read. One of the weirdest things to see right is the demonization of monoclonal antibodies. Considering that PAXLOVID is intended to cost 700 dollars and antibodies are around 1k I find it hard to argue this is a money issue. I'm not sure where Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine will be come next year. They've been targeted so much as well they won't let anything come out of it. I would still like to see an Ivermectin/Ritonavir study or at least a valid pharmocological/toxicological reason as to why it would not be feasible.
I agree, I think it's incredibly strange as well. I think "they" don't want anything to be perceived as effective besides the vaccine. Or I also wonder if some of it has to do particularly with governor Ron DeSantis. He's been one of the greatest proponents of monoclonal antibodies, and I think the "powers that be" desperately don't want him to be successful in any way.
I agree with you about hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. No matter what studies come out, they both have negative connotations associated with them that might be hard for doctors to overcome, (in addition to the hospital protocols that forbid them). Unfortunately it seems to be less about settled or unsettled science, than about information and perception at this point. I wonder how we will look back on this 20 years from now, what the consensus will be.
Well recent information makes it seem as if there was a one-track mind to COVID and everything was put into vaccines. Now there are reports of possible shortages of monoclonal antibodies which would be devastating.
I would have to wonder how much of true science will be left after the pandemic ends (if it ever does). It's pretty upsetting that all of this is making me question how much science out there truly is science if it is most likely to be filtered through corporations and the "right" avenues before being presented to us.