12 Comments

I am honored beyond words. Kind of you to mention me, and I really did enjoy reading your careful exegesis … as always, I also get an awful lot from the discussions that ensue. Susan’s intelligent point below, for example.

Expand full comment

Thank you Judith! I do try to reference people who point me towards information. I know I mentioned I'd look into it back in February but I lacked the pathology knowledge and that would take a good deal to figure out, so within this context I wanted to see if anything pointed to something worth investigating.

Expand full comment

My first issue with the vaccine rollout was that there was no requirement for a person to get medical clearance from their doctor to receive the vaccine. This was especially disconcerting to me because the first people authorized to receive the vaccine were people with pre-existing morbidity conditions. This would mean they were already on at least 1 type of medication long term and possibly several. I believed there should have at least been a consultation required with their doctor to determine possible drug-interactions. Alas silly me.. how could there be a way to determine possible drug interactions with the ingredients in the vaccine are not fully known... still to this day.

Yes, the medications given for ADHD have the potential side effect for risk of cardiovascular damage. Since there are so many children on this medication from a very early age... this SHOULD HAVE BEEN A BLACK BOX WARNING FOR THEM given by the FDA for all vaccines.

FOR SHAME....

Expand full comment

Sorry I haven't gotten to your prior comments Susan. I tend to get lost in the weeds and forget to reply back.

I did find it rather strange that the hysteria right at the initial rollout dealt with anaphylactic shock and that disappeared as soon as it came. I think that just shows how powerful messaging and public persuasion can shift narratives. All of this is bad because they were essentially going into this blind, so there likely was no prior assumption to even consider contraindicators.

I want to be careful in making arguments that ADHD medications may be causing these cases of myocarditis, but it points to the fact that we should have found evidence to suggest that wouldn't be an issue before giving it to so many people. At the point that the autopsy indicated Catecholamine-mediated cardiopathy it should have raised concerns over all additional possibilities.

Expand full comment

Wow! One way of taking out the other group of drug addicts which weren’t dealt with OxyContin. Take out the meth addicts…

Sorry, this is near and dear to my heart…

Expand full comment

I'm sorry that happened ABD. There's certainly a lot of problems with many of our pharmaceuticals but it requires an understanding of what these drugs do and why they can be very dangerous. I think doctors have obfuscated a lot of the actual teaching of the public to make them fully aware of exactly what their medications do, which is why I write the posts that I do.

I do want to be more hesitant in making an argument that this is intentional. If this does have any significance I would assume that this may be a bigger issue of ignorance and complacency to look even deeper into the matter. As more evidence came out there probably should have been reasons to investigate other additional factors.

And no need to apologize for explaining something personal! Many people have personal reasons to be critical of everything going on. We should just take care to not let the emotions overtake our ability to reason and look at things rationally.

Expand full comment

Absolutely. And thank you for your answer. Yes I agree, it wasn’t intentional on the part of my doctor, he truly tried to help. He believed it.

I would say, there was a similarity in the sense that when the truth was revealed, and it was clear that I was now addicted, he freaked out, and he dumped me as a patient. At that point, I became “deplorable,” but that’s a cultural/societal problem.

I think many doctors, once they finally begin practicing, are so “done with” school, they never want to have to learn again. And often it’s an ego thing, thinking they surely know it all. But that’s just my read on it, obviously it’s just my opinion/perspective.

Thank you very much, for what you do, and for the personal response…

♥️

Expand full comment

It's a really difficult scenario. I think many doctors try in good-faith to do right by their patients, but in cases where things may not turn out they way they would expect they may approach the position in a moment of shame or attempt to save face. I wonder if there's that fact that caused your doctor to act that way. It's a reason why I sort of go back and forth given the current situation with doctors. Many doctors may want to do what is right, but in a time of uncertainty there is no "right" and so if your actions lead to the death of the patient it's on you. However, if you follow the orders from somewhere else then the blame doesn't fall on you- you can externalize those problems to other agencies.

And so I think many doctors do make an earnest attempt to help their patients but at the end of the day they are human and may act accordingly.

The learning thing is certainly true as well. I think it's the move from science or medicine as an endeavor to a profession and an establishment that stops people from learning. They're established and they may default onto their practice as well as their appeal to authority.

There's really a lot going on and at the end of the day we have to keep in mind that doctors are, after all, human.

And you're welcome ABD! I apologize for not responding earlier! I've been pretty bad at responding to comments but I try to do so, but thank you for sharing your story and I hope you are doing well.

Expand full comment

*I'm going to reply, but don’t feel that it means you have to. I understand how difficult it might be to have hundreds of readers and comments, I appreciate you.

First of all, I’m fine, been off opiates for 7 years now. That said, I did manage to get a felony for possession in the process, so in some ways I’ll never have the life I have worked hard to acquire prior to that chapter. And it isn’t easy to be a felon and an antivaxxer…🤣🤷‍♀️🤣

Btw, your take on doctors is “dark.” If the dilemma revolves around “could I be blamed?”

My formula is easy, anyone who’s “sleeping” is sleeping, I think at this point attempting to wake them up, is equally insane. Those who wake up, I expect them to embody a “boy sorry I’m late, I can’t believe I didn’t hear or see anything… WHAT CAN I DO?”

Those who wake up and then pretend to be sleeping, or those who are sleeping and are condescending, and grandstanding with “Amir, thank god you stopped getting high, cuz you’re fried… get vaxxed, dumbfuck”

Well… let’s hope my meditations yield some oneness, or nirvana before it’s time to dance on their graves… so I can be the “better man”

Sorry for again tl,dr.

Much love!

Expand full comment

So Catecholamines do or do not cause insulin dependence in children or it’s not know? Does the presence of Catecholamines affect overweight children’s ability to lose weight? I actually knew personally a couple of men who died from Covid in hospital and a couple of others I knew relative or friend. Two of these men were really overweight, one even obese. Another was just a very big man, like 6’4. Does Covid also cause Catecholamines? I do know all these men had those killer protocols at the hospital, too. I really think that’s what killed them, but they felt sick enough to go to the hospital.

Expand full comment

Apologies for responding late Canny Granny! The hypothesis proposed above appears to provide a hypothesis that runs antithetical to adult obesity. Obesity itself is such a multifaceted disease and it's hard to pin down what is the cause or what is the result of a diseased state. Therefore the multitude of diseases associated with obesity may be a result of obesity or may be a result of another factor that also influences obesity. The insulin factor as proposed for children seems to suggest that excess Catecholamines eventually dampens the response to Catecholamines (resistance is gained), and the Catecholamine resistance leads to unchecked insulin. I believe they assume that the unchecked insulin may eventually lead to insulin resistance. As to why this may be occurring there isn't much information on that, and the hypothesis itself is very spotty. Children have elevated Catecholamine levels especially around puberty so there could be some relationship to energy resources during puberty at play, but I'd just be speculating about that.

The problem is that, in general, lipolysis/lipogenesis depends on the receptor type being activated, as well as the subtype. It is all rather confusing and I would admit that my assessment doesn't do much to fully clear up the issues. I think most of this may be a consequence of limited data and studies.

I'm sorry about those people Canny Granny. It's well-known that obesity is a risk factor for severe COVID to begin with, and again there could be many factors such as other comorbidities. Essentially in order to pinpoint what exactly caused that would require one to know the story of each friend and their health history. Obesity is a slow disease that comes on over time and comes with it many other dangerous risk factors. As to COVID increasing Catecholamine levels that would be a yes. Any form of stress can raise Catecholamine levels such as chronic stress, disease, or loss of a loved one. It's likely where the takotsubo cardiomyopathy got it's association with "broken-heart disease". So this could be another case in which the culmination of factors lead to the predicaments.

That's why, for some of the COVID protocols I don't think that they themselves are a huge problem. I think there's a bit of a narrative going on that suggests that these protocols are deadly, when it's the fact that the timing and the disease progression make these protocols more dangerous similar to my remarks at the beginning of the post. That's at least what I think for Remdesivir. I think if it was provided early it may not be as toxic, especially for a drug that's intended to be used as an antiviral. However, at the point that many people are hospitalized and already undergoing organ damage administering Remdesivir then may be more harmful than beneficial. It's the context in which the drug is used that's important.

Again, I'm sorry that happened to those men Canny Granny. At the end of the day it really is a bad situation all-around and irrespective of what side of the vaccine argument we are on there are many people who passed either due to COVID or due to the current situation with the medical industry.

Expand full comment

let's get some logic here:

"we should take care not to look at vaccines alone and exclude other features that may work together with the vaccines to cause the serious adverse reactions being seen." ???

MAY??? First of all, covid injections are NOT vaccines, that is a DECEPTION NO 1.

Would the exploading reports after the GENE MODIFICATION covid INJECTIONS in VAERS be out there with the old style real vaccines?? NO, we'd never hear about vaccines causing issues, except for reports from the real specialists who look into vaccines for many,many years. Getting the basics in synthetic gene treatments and reprogramming the human bodies is the most essential right now.

Getting away from it, is the biggest deception of all times.

Expand full comment