Taking it at face value, given the lack of data around the individual, it's not impossible that he represents the other end of the bell curve/spectrum. While most cannot fathom submitting to that much ridiculousness with these shots, it's still very possible that someone would, and since there's no collated hard data on actual vaccinated statuses vs injuries stats per country, or globally (that I know of, please correct me if I'm wrong and point me to it), theres no way to state unequivocally that the shots harm in EVERY single instance, just as equally there's no way to say 100% that they do. I know I won't be popular with either side in stating that and frankly don't give a fig😉
Sure theres massive evidence to suggest that they are contaminated. Massive evidence to show that they fail to perform as specified. Gargantuan evidence to show that these are indeed injuring a huge amount of people in multiple, irreversible ways, and certainly we are well past the pivotal point where they should have been pulled from market based on evidence of 3 years ago. But there's no data YET, to show that every person that's had the shot is harmed. Even for the basic concept that we have no universal spike/LNP diagnostic, uniquely specific to these shots.🤷♀️😐🤐
With how many people are on the planet the probability of any event occurring is nonzero. There are going to be people who may experience egregious harms from the vaccines; there are people who may be perfectly fine. The problem is capturing that group that may have been harmed and understanding what may be going on- I think this is why, in some ways, the vaccine skeptic community is going through some weird tumultuous time because it doesn't appear that answers are coming out as quickly as people may have hoped. Brian Mowrey have written a few times about the fact that there is likely a cohort of people who may benefit from the vaccines, but that still doesn't suggest mandating them or giving it to everyone, and he seems to receive some criticism regarding making these comments.
But in this case it doesn't seem out of the ordinary that there may be one person out there who can be jabbed to infinity and appear OK. Again, there's a non-zero probability of any event. This also includes the probability that this was all a lie.
I have much respect for Brian's work. He's not afraid to get into the weeds and do some hard work on a subject, but mostly because he's not afraid to be unpopular with the camp crowds. He won't be bullied into agreeing just to get along, or because "we are all on the same side".😉 If he thinks it's crappy science, he'll call it. Alot like you😉.
The inconsistency of the composition of each shot is known.
The lack of data on each shot he took is suspicious and the reason felt the need to suggest there may be more to his shots than reported, could he be a plant getting that many shots but from the safer vials to prove they shots are safe and does he really exist? and more questions from there could be suggested.. Never under estimate the deadstream media and controllers desire to squeeze out and suppress the facts or to outright produce false information
I don't think they would use safer vials because at that point you may as well lie about giving the vaccines, or just give saline injections from the start and make it all up. There's a lot about the story that is worth criticizing such as the multiple vaccines in one day which should have immediately caused people to become suspicious of something.
It could be, but like I said in my Notes (but to summarize it better) if they wanted to lie we should expect some degree of plausibility. That is, a few dozen vaccines is already egregious- 217 is so absurd that only the most ardent vaccine zealots would look at this as being reflective of something very good. I'm not sure how many people would find this to be something else other than an entirely absurd premise.
That being said, it may operate in some way to make people feel assuaged about their vaccinations, but this is a case report with so much speculation and of only one man that honestly it shouldn't really be generalized to all vaccinated people.
At the end of the day, given everything going on I wouldn't be surprised if this turned out either real or fake.
The most likely possibility is that he was colluding with vaccine staffers to create fake covid passports. He probably got more than a few jabs but definitely not 217.
Some reports seem to suggest that he may have been doing something regarding vaccine cards, so that may be the case. Certainly the accuracy of the actual number is one of the things that stands out the most.
This man is either a Walter Mitty type and is indulging in fantastic daydreaming or he is a masochist, either way he will be deriving great pleasure from the attention he is receiving and is welcome to it all. Or maybe the whole scenario is greatly exaggerated or did not happen, who knows in this era of the covid con.
How come mr HIM is still alive? it matter little whether it was 20 or 200 shots. His story is a bit embarrassing for some absurd anti-VAXX arguments regarding the adaptative immune response and adverse effects.
How is it embarrassing for those critical of the vaccines? This is a case report of only one individual in which the actual accuracy of this report is under question. And really, if anything, the authors themselves suggest that the adaptive response wasn't helped either way. While one perspective may suggest that this doesn't appear to suggest anything negative regarding the vaccines, another perspective may actually argue that it's evident of an exercise in futility. If it's believed that this person received all of these vaccines and still didn't show any benefit in their adaptive immune response relative to the reference group then what exactly would be the point of continuous boosters and vaccines?
Or is this a way to attempt to show the jabs are safe by creating an imaginary person receiving jabs
Taking it at face value, given the lack of data around the individual, it's not impossible that he represents the other end of the bell curve/spectrum. While most cannot fathom submitting to that much ridiculousness with these shots, it's still very possible that someone would, and since there's no collated hard data on actual vaccinated statuses vs injuries stats per country, or globally (that I know of, please correct me if I'm wrong and point me to it), theres no way to state unequivocally that the shots harm in EVERY single instance, just as equally there's no way to say 100% that they do. I know I won't be popular with either side in stating that and frankly don't give a fig😉
Sure theres massive evidence to suggest that they are contaminated. Massive evidence to show that they fail to perform as specified. Gargantuan evidence to show that these are indeed injuring a huge amount of people in multiple, irreversible ways, and certainly we are well past the pivotal point where they should have been pulled from market based on evidence of 3 years ago. But there's no data YET, to show that every person that's had the shot is harmed. Even for the basic concept that we have no universal spike/LNP diagnostic, uniquely specific to these shots.🤷♀️😐🤐
#callingmedicalinnovators #diagnostics2proveharms #wearemany #wearememory #wewillnotforgive #mistakeswereNOTmade #getlocalised
With how many people are on the planet the probability of any event occurring is nonzero. There are going to be people who may experience egregious harms from the vaccines; there are people who may be perfectly fine. The problem is capturing that group that may have been harmed and understanding what may be going on- I think this is why, in some ways, the vaccine skeptic community is going through some weird tumultuous time because it doesn't appear that answers are coming out as quickly as people may have hoped. Brian Mowrey have written a few times about the fact that there is likely a cohort of people who may benefit from the vaccines, but that still doesn't suggest mandating them or giving it to everyone, and he seems to receive some criticism regarding making these comments.
https://unglossed.substack.com/p/three-years-of-denial
But in this case it doesn't seem out of the ordinary that there may be one person out there who can be jabbed to infinity and appear OK. Again, there's a non-zero probability of any event. This also includes the probability that this was all a lie.
I have much respect for Brian's work. He's not afraid to get into the weeds and do some hard work on a subject, but mostly because he's not afraid to be unpopular with the camp crowds. He won't be bullied into agreeing just to get along, or because "we are all on the same side".😉 If he thinks it's crappy science, he'll call it. Alot like you😉.
The inconsistency of the composition of each shot is known.
The lack of data on each shot he took is suspicious and the reason felt the need to suggest there may be more to his shots than reported, could he be a plant getting that many shots but from the safer vials to prove they shots are safe and does he really exist? and more questions from there could be suggested.. Never under estimate the deadstream media and controllers desire to squeeze out and suppress the facts or to outright produce false information
I don't think they would use safer vials because at that point you may as well lie about giving the vaccines, or just give saline injections from the start and make it all up. There's a lot about the story that is worth criticizing such as the multiple vaccines in one day which should have immediately caused people to become suspicious of something.
Surprises me that he would have been able to get them to give him 217 "registered" jabs, which causes me to feel the whole report was made up
It could be, but like I said in my Notes (but to summarize it better) if they wanted to lie we should expect some degree of plausibility. That is, a few dozen vaccines is already egregious- 217 is so absurd that only the most ardent vaccine zealots would look at this as being reflective of something very good. I'm not sure how many people would find this to be something else other than an entirely absurd premise.
That being said, it may operate in some way to make people feel assuaged about their vaccinations, but this is a case report with so much speculation and of only one man that honestly it shouldn't really be generalized to all vaccinated people.
At the end of the day, given everything going on I wouldn't be surprised if this turned out either real or fake.
The most likely possibility is that he was colluding with vaccine staffers to create fake covid passports. He probably got more than a few jabs but definitely not 217.
Some reports seem to suggest that he may have been doing something regarding vaccine cards, so that may be the case. Certainly the accuracy of the actual number is one of the things that stands out the most.
This man is either a Walter Mitty type and is indulging in fantastic daydreaming or he is a masochist, either way he will be deriving great pleasure from the attention he is receiving and is welcome to it all. Or maybe the whole scenario is greatly exaggerated or did not happen, who knows in this era of the covid con.
Check this out Doc!! ;) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-13202947/Prescriptions-Eli-Lillys-newly-approved-weight-loss-drug-Zepbound-overtake-Wegovy-time-nearly-150-000-Americans-filling-script-shots-WEEK.html
How come mr HIM is still alive? it matter little whether it was 20 or 200 shots. His story is a bit embarrassing for some absurd anti-VAXX arguments regarding the adaptative immune response and adverse effects.
How is it embarrassing for those critical of the vaccines? This is a case report of only one individual in which the actual accuracy of this report is under question. And really, if anything, the authors themselves suggest that the adaptive response wasn't helped either way. While one perspective may suggest that this doesn't appear to suggest anything negative regarding the vaccines, another perspective may actually argue that it's evident of an exercise in futility. If it's believed that this person received all of these vaccines and still didn't show any benefit in their adaptive immune response relative to the reference group then what exactly would be the point of continuous boosters and vaccines?