It’s hard to look at the way media portrays much of the news these days without immediately assuming there’s a spin or heavy bias. The once great pillars of information dissemination in our society has shown itself to be farcical partisan hacks more than actual arbiters of truth.
Let’s be honest. Covid pulled back the curtain on school indoctrination but President Trump pulled back the curtain on “Fake News” and the “Washington Swamp” which the multi millionaire reporters and anchors are now a part of
I think most people are generally aware things were not quite right, but they were either trained to remove that intuition or they were just so staunchly against their opponent that they would rather side with people who tell them what they want to hear rather than think for themselves. Having Trump around kind of let them have someone else to attack and that kind of gave people the outsider's perspective and go, "Oh, this is the crap that the media's been pulling this whole time!" I think that's why the media is trying so hard to clamp down on so-called "misinformation" to try to gain back the narrative they once had.
I think until we have legislation holding the media accountable for their propaganda they purport as fact we will never regain our freedoms back or trust of what is fact which have been set back these last many years.
I'm not sure legislation would be the answer if people still yearn for this type of propaganda. It may be better to wake people up and stop watching mainstream news and letting them die out on their own, but that itself is easier said than done.
People absolutely should tune out the mainstream news but we still need legislation to hold their feet to the fire and demand accountability of their purposeful untruths. This is what’s wrong with the Country. No accountability for the criminality going on
I had not heard of Kim Iversen until the recent fuss over her leaving The Hill's "Rising" YouTube-based commercial news, opinion, comment program. Her website is https://www.kimiversen.com .
I had never looked into a locals.com site, but she has long had a site there: https://kimiversen.locals.com . This is something like substack.com, but not so focused on writing as Substack. There seems to be more video and wide-ranging discussion among members. Anyone can join her site, channel, community or whatever it is for free, but for USD$5 a month, one can: "Access all content including exclusive, ad-free content. Post and comment on content and discussions. Join live chats with Dinesh and the rest of the supporters." The last bit puzzles me - I guess it is Dinesh D'Souza, 2.4M Twitter followers, who made the documantary (I don't know the veracity) https://2000mules.com - the trailer of which gives me a headache because it is so manipulative. I don't know what the connection is. A Google search for "Dinesh" and "Kim Iversen" turns up only 2900 hits, the first of which may be of little consequence.
I subscribed. Bright, communicative, investigative journalists who question the vaccine-centric COVID-19 response play a crucial role in tackling the current disaster.
She has a Twitter perch: https://twitter.com/KimIversenShow but in a video about leaving 'Rising" she said how much she hates it. At least some of her videos are at: https://rumble.com/c/KimIversen - most recently "Biden Pushes For MORE Pills and Shots For Americans Despite Rebounds. Pfizer Makes Bank". Both super-vaxed Fauci and Biden had rebounds after Paxlovid. Pfizer's quarterly revenue surges 47% year-on-year and profit by 78% to USD$9.9B . . . Paxlovid sales of USD$8.8B . . . expecting USD$22B total Paxlovid sales for the year and USD$32B for "the vaccine". "Vaccine" sales are slowing, so they are raising the price by 27%!
It would be good if she read Igor Chudov's recent article wondering why the body wouldn't respond to these repeated mRNA (or adenovirus vector) storms of toxic spike protein much like it does to repeated injections of antigens which are intended to train the immune system to develop *tolerance*. https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/joe-bidens-paxlovid-rebound-caused .
Ironically, I believe Locals was created to look quite similar to Substack. Not to say plagiarism is happening, but the similarities are quite pronounced and I think it was intentional. Locals has grown quite a bit in recent months and I've considered having a Locals but I find it hard to grow an audience unless you have an audience. Substack has a similar problem, but I think for Locals the intent of Locals makes it more difficult than Substack.
Dinesh is an interesting character. I haven't watched 2000 mules but I believe it's available on Rumble? I believe it's about voter manipulation in the US which is quite a hot topic. I'm not sure the association between the two, but I think Kim has made comments about the 2020 election but I don't think about voter manipulation- more that she believed Trump would have been better than Biden.
As to the tolerance, I think that word may start to be thrown around a bit too often similar to OAS. From Brian's post, it appears that this is a consequence more associated with the mRNA injection, and likely through repeat boosters which tells us there could be a specific mechanism with the mRNA and some of the additional compounds, presentation of spike, and possibly the timing. There's hardly any research on tolerance and so we're likely to not find robust research aside from Brian Mowrey's article.
She has her YouTube channel and I think she's posting things on Rockfin that may be too naughty for YouTube. It's The Hill's loss at the end of they day.
No but I'll make sure to take a look in the future! I think we all need a good laugh now and again. As horrible and melancholic all of this may be it's always good to get perspective and understand that not everything has to be bleak all of the time.
The interview is full of nothing but people criticizing The Hill for not allowing Kim Iversen. I think they'll notice a slow death similar to what was seen when Saagar and Krystal went on to do their own thing.
Yeah she was always doing her own thing, but she definitely become much well-known on Rising. Hopefully a lot of the viewership follow her back to her channel.
Let’s be honest. Covid pulled back the curtain on school indoctrination but President Trump pulled back the curtain on “Fake News” and the “Washington Swamp” which the multi millionaire reporters and anchors are now a part of
I think most people are generally aware things were not quite right, but they were either trained to remove that intuition or they were just so staunchly against their opponent that they would rather side with people who tell them what they want to hear rather than think for themselves. Having Trump around kind of let them have someone else to attack and that kind of gave people the outsider's perspective and go, "Oh, this is the crap that the media's been pulling this whole time!" I think that's why the media is trying so hard to clamp down on so-called "misinformation" to try to gain back the narrative they once had.
I think until we have legislation holding the media accountable for their propaganda they purport as fact we will never regain our freedoms back or trust of what is fact which have been set back these last many years.
I'm not sure legislation would be the answer if people still yearn for this type of propaganda. It may be better to wake people up and stop watching mainstream news and letting them die out on their own, but that itself is easier said than done.
People absolutely should tune out the mainstream news but we still need legislation to hold their feet to the fire and demand accountability of their purposeful untruths. This is what’s wrong with the Country. No accountability for the criminality going on
I had not heard of Kim Iversen until the recent fuss over her leaving The Hill's "Rising" YouTube-based commercial news, opinion, comment program. Her website is https://www.kimiversen.com .
I had never looked into a locals.com site, but she has long had a site there: https://kimiversen.locals.com . This is something like substack.com, but not so focused on writing as Substack. There seems to be more video and wide-ranging discussion among members. Anyone can join her site, channel, community or whatever it is for free, but for USD$5 a month, one can: "Access all content including exclusive, ad-free content. Post and comment on content and discussions. Join live chats with Dinesh and the rest of the supporters." The last bit puzzles me - I guess it is Dinesh D'Souza, 2.4M Twitter followers, who made the documantary (I don't know the veracity) https://2000mules.com - the trailer of which gives me a headache because it is so manipulative. I don't know what the connection is. A Google search for "Dinesh" and "Kim Iversen" turns up only 2900 hits, the first of which may be of little consequence.
I subscribed. Bright, communicative, investigative journalists who question the vaccine-centric COVID-19 response play a crucial role in tackling the current disaster.
She has a Twitter perch: https://twitter.com/KimIversenShow but in a video about leaving 'Rising" she said how much she hates it. At least some of her videos are at: https://rumble.com/c/KimIversen - most recently "Biden Pushes For MORE Pills and Shots For Americans Despite Rebounds. Pfizer Makes Bank". Both super-vaxed Fauci and Biden had rebounds after Paxlovid. Pfizer's quarterly revenue surges 47% year-on-year and profit by 78% to USD$9.9B . . . Paxlovid sales of USD$8.8B . . . expecting USD$22B total Paxlovid sales for the year and USD$32B for "the vaccine". "Vaccine" sales are slowing, so they are raising the price by 27%!
It would be good if she read Igor Chudov's recent article wondering why the body wouldn't respond to these repeated mRNA (or adenovirus vector) storms of toxic spike protein much like it does to repeated injections of antigens which are intended to train the immune system to develop *tolerance*. https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/joe-bidens-paxlovid-rebound-caused .
Ironically, I believe Locals was created to look quite similar to Substack. Not to say plagiarism is happening, but the similarities are quite pronounced and I think it was intentional. Locals has grown quite a bit in recent months and I've considered having a Locals but I find it hard to grow an audience unless you have an audience. Substack has a similar problem, but I think for Locals the intent of Locals makes it more difficult than Substack.
Dinesh is an interesting character. I haven't watched 2000 mules but I believe it's available on Rumble? I believe it's about voter manipulation in the US which is quite a hot topic. I'm not sure the association between the two, but I think Kim has made comments about the 2020 election but I don't think about voter manipulation- more that she believed Trump would have been better than Biden.
As to the tolerance, I think that word may start to be thrown around a bit too often similar to OAS. From Brian's post, it appears that this is a consequence more associated with the mRNA injection, and likely through repeat boosters which tells us there could be a specific mechanism with the mRNA and some of the additional compounds, presentation of spike, and possibly the timing. There's hardly any research on tolerance and so we're likely to not find robust research aside from Brian Mowrey's article.
OMG Kim is leaving!!! NOOOOOOO!!!!!
She has her YouTube channel and I think she's posting things on Rockfin that may be too naughty for YouTube. It's The Hill's loss at the end of they day.
P.S. Did you see Jim Breuer's comedy act about the pandemic and everyone running to get injected? It's hilarious. I had tears in my eyes.
First 12 minutes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bItcoUb5xsw
No but I'll make sure to take a look in the future! I think we all need a good laugh now and again. As horrible and melancholic all of this may be it's always good to get perspective and understand that not everything has to be bleak all of the time.
Yes, thanks...I went and found it after reading your post. Yep, I --and apparently many others by reading the comments--unsubscribed.
The interview is full of nothing but people criticizing The Hill for not allowing Kim Iversen. I think they'll notice a slow death similar to what was seen when Saagar and Krystal went on to do their own thing.
She's been doing her own news videos for years before she was on rising.
Yeah she was always doing her own thing, but she definitely become much well-known on Rising. Hopefully a lot of the viewership follow her back to her channel.