Even after using Substack for many months I'm still trying to figure out a few things. Anyways, here's part 2 of the Introduction to Vaccinology post which focuses on vaccine failures:
Bravo! Three thumbs up!👍👍👍 Excellent post that I'll be sharing.
I remember putting this information to friends early on, who I thought were intelligent, and being shut down about it, due to their assumption that if they caught Covid, they were likely to die, so Any benefit was good, they thought.
So the narrative took control, and it became invasion of the body snatchers.
It was pretty crazy how quickly people were led into believing they were going to die. My whole family and friends thought that they would die, and when I got COVID my family thought that I should have keeled over for being unvaccinated. Unfortunately, my body decided not to follow the narrative, much to their chagrin I suppose 🤣.
But thank you Paul! It definitely took some time to put together!
I know many have heard of it, but have any actually read "Tulip Mania" ??? Or, any works focusing on human behavior in reaction to fear ? There was a Brad Pitt film some years ago, Babel, that also illustrated what people are capable of when fear takes over. Watch out for what is coming as election time nears ? ? ?
No, but that sounds like another book I'm going to have to add to my imaginary list that I should actually make physical. I unfortunately keep losing my imaginary list!
I think it would be interesting to read more about. Someone mentioned a few things about the bubonic plague that was interesting and I may want to consider reading about at some point as well.
I do hope that people reading about fear can understand whether they themselves are engaging in the same fear behaviors. I'm starting to see some forms of mass formation psychosis possibly emerging within the COVID skeptic side as well.
Many individuals we ALL thought were well educated, had some background in "science", and graduate university degrees, and yet...went "off the rails" when they feared that Covid might "take their life"..... it's been exceptional to watch this unfold. Never under estimate the fears of a human being !
I like to quote Heather Heying when she states that many people are educated, but not intelligent. I think many people need to realize there's actually a significant difference!
Trying to pass off relative risk reduction as absolute risk reduction was one of the big early red flags for me. Pharma, the cdc, and corporate media were all involved in this deception.
I explained it to a friend like this. I have a metal suit for you to wear every time you go outside, and 95% of the time it will protect you from hospitalization and death in case space junk falls on you. Oh you don't have a high risk of space junk falling on you? It doesn't matter, this metal suit is 95% protective against hospitalization and death.
Ohh, one of the websites that looked at the Pfizer data and the absolute risk reduction had an analogy of wearing a rubber suit to protect against lightning. It's interesting this seems absurd but then here we are where people are yelling at everyone to wear their suits and yet we are the crazy ones.
Probably one of the most important things ever written for public consumption...yet, the truth remains that the percentage of people who will read this, will probably never be enough to change "how things just are". That is a tragedy, a true tragedy. What are we, as a society, doing to ourselves ? ? And why ? ?
Well you know one way to solve it is to share it around! I'm just kidding, I'd rather not sound like those Youtubers who spend 5 minutes telling people to like, subscribe and share when the whole video is only 10 minutes long...
Several people have already covered these issues, but I suppose it's important for the fact that you never really know who is aware of these issues until you put it out there and see how people respond. It's some food for thought when you have to remind people that your vaccine doesn't work when you decide to stay away from everyone else and live inside a bubble of your own creation.
However - and I know this was outside the scope of this piece so it's not means as criticsim - having been party to substantial crunching of data contained within the "Pfizer docs" released under court order I can safely say that even the results which you quote from (162 vs 8) are highly suspect. They look like they are created with the aid of an unblinded "statistical sieve" (the trial is in essence open label) to preferentially direct symptomatic cases in the placebo group and not the active group for PCR testing.
Oh, I don't put much faith into these studies, but I'm just using the information provided because trying to go down that rabbit hole will require a ton of my time and more of my sanity. Also, at the end of the day these numbers make it pretty egregious that there's been an over exaggeration occurring, so we don't necessarily need worse numbers to show how bad these numbers are.
We need multiple attacks since different people understand different things.
Some will never get the point you and I ae trying to make re ARR v RRR but they all understand fraud.
Take this tweet (actually of an article I wrote for HART) - it got 100 x as many RTs as most others, I think because literally everyone could understand what they were up to and it touched a nerve.
Oh that's really interesting. I've heard of that happening which is rather ridiculous to try to fudge the data in such a manner.
I tend to cover a lot of the biochemical/pharmacological effects rather than any actual statistical measurements, so I usually cover drugs and compounds more than looking at statistical data. But I certainly hope other people are diving into this information as well to look into the clinical trials and the failures that came about.
Well, yea, mischaracterization of the data is what 1984 implies. Whether by the CCP, the CDC, big pHarma.
The government always lies. Viet Nam taught the US that an untethered press is untenable to the lies they promulgate, so made co-opting MSM a priority. Here, there, everywhere
Even after using Substack for many months I'm still trying to figure out a few things. Anyways, here's part 2 of the Introduction to Vaccinology post which focuses on vaccine failures:
https://moderndiscontent.substack.com/p/introduction-to-vaccinology-part-2d8?s=w
Bravo! Three thumbs up!👍👍👍 Excellent post that I'll be sharing.
I remember putting this information to friends early on, who I thought were intelligent, and being shut down about it, due to their assumption that if they caught Covid, they were likely to die, so Any benefit was good, they thought.
So the narrative took control, and it became invasion of the body snatchers.
It was pretty crazy how quickly people were led into believing they were going to die. My whole family and friends thought that they would die, and when I got COVID my family thought that I should have keeled over for being unvaccinated. Unfortunately, my body decided not to follow the narrative, much to their chagrin I suppose 🤣.
But thank you Paul! It definitely took some time to put together!
I know many have heard of it, but have any actually read "Tulip Mania" ??? Or, any works focusing on human behavior in reaction to fear ? There was a Brad Pitt film some years ago, Babel, that also illustrated what people are capable of when fear takes over. Watch out for what is coming as election time nears ? ? ?
No, but that sounds like another book I'm going to have to add to my imaginary list that I should actually make physical. I unfortunately keep losing my imaginary list!
I think it would be interesting to read more about. Someone mentioned a few things about the bubonic plague that was interesting and I may want to consider reading about at some point as well.
I do hope that people reading about fear can understand whether they themselves are engaging in the same fear behaviors. I'm starting to see some forms of mass formation psychosis possibly emerging within the COVID skeptic side as well.
Many individuals we ALL thought were well educated, had some background in "science", and graduate university degrees, and yet...went "off the rails" when they feared that Covid might "take their life"..... it's been exceptional to watch this unfold. Never under estimate the fears of a human being !
I like to quote Heather Heying when she states that many people are educated, but not intelligent. I think many people need to realize there's actually a significant difference!
Trying to pass off relative risk reduction as absolute risk reduction was one of the big early red flags for me. Pharma, the cdc, and corporate media were all involved in this deception.
I explained it to a friend like this. I have a metal suit for you to wear every time you go outside, and 95% of the time it will protect you from hospitalization and death in case space junk falls on you. Oh you don't have a high risk of space junk falling on you? It doesn't matter, this metal suit is 95% protective against hospitalization and death.
Wear the fucking suit.
Ohh, one of the websites that looked at the Pfizer data and the absolute risk reduction had an analogy of wearing a rubber suit to protect against lightning. It's interesting this seems absurd but then here we are where people are yelling at everyone to wear their suits and yet we are the crazy ones.
Right!?!
Ah, maybe that's where I got that analogy.
"These vaccines needed to have been stress-tested during clinical trials."
What a "PERFECT" statement!
"Ya Think?"
I don't remember the movie, but this guy and gal saw their friend go over a cliff in some big Caddy or something.
While they were sitting in a club remembering their dear departed friend, HE WALKS IN!
What did he say?
"Fucking Airbag!"
Probably one of the most important things ever written for public consumption...yet, the truth remains that the percentage of people who will read this, will probably never be enough to change "how things just are". That is a tragedy, a true tragedy. What are we, as a society, doing to ourselves ? ? And why ? ?
Well you know one way to solve it is to share it around! I'm just kidding, I'd rather not sound like those Youtubers who spend 5 minutes telling people to like, subscribe and share when the whole video is only 10 minutes long...
Several people have already covered these issues, but I suppose it's important for the fact that you never really know who is aware of these issues until you put it out there and see how people respond. It's some food for thought when you have to remind people that your vaccine doesn't work when you decide to stay away from everyone else and live inside a bubble of your own creation.
Thanks for an excellent description, something I have been trying to drum into people for a year and a half now (see my pinned tweet: https://twitter.com/jengleruk/status/1348610177805799425?s=20&t=fBi5dqk9CwQFNw8KrZJG7Q)
However - and I know this was outside the scope of this piece so it's not means as criticsim - having been party to substantial crunching of data contained within the "Pfizer docs" released under court order I can safely say that even the results which you quote from (162 vs 8) are highly suspect. They look like they are created with the aid of an unblinded "statistical sieve" (the trial is in essence open label) to preferentially direct symptomatic cases in the placebo group and not the active group for PCR testing.
Oh, I don't put much faith into these studies, but I'm just using the information provided because trying to go down that rabbit hole will require a ton of my time and more of my sanity. Also, at the end of the day these numbers make it pretty egregious that there's been an over exaggeration occurring, so we don't necessarily need worse numbers to show how bad these numbers are.
We need multiple attacks since different people understand different things.
Some will never get the point you and I ae trying to make re ARR v RRR but they all understand fraud.
Take this tweet (actually of an article I wrote for HART) - it got 100 x as many RTs as most others, I think because literally everyone could understand what they were up to and it touched a nerve.
https://twitter.com/hartgroup_org/status/1532270885612175360?s=20&t=5BjIWujuyq-pRqwUjKhi4Q
Oh that's really interesting. I've heard of that happening which is rather ridiculous to try to fudge the data in such a manner.
I tend to cover a lot of the biochemical/pharmacological effects rather than any actual statistical measurements, so I usually cover drugs and compounds more than looking at statistical data. But I certainly hope other people are diving into this information as well to look into the clinical trials and the failures that came about.
Well, yea, mischaracterization of the data is what 1984 implies. Whether by the CCP, the CDC, big pHarma.
The government always lies. Viet Nam taught the US that an untethered press is untenable to the lies they promulgate, so made co-opting MSM a priority. Here, there, everywhere
Sign our petition calling for an investigation into Pfizer clinical trial fraud allegations
Most Americans think the fraud allegations against Pfizer (as well as their own admission of fraud in court) should be investigated.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/should-the-fda-investigate-pfizer