Upon lookin at some people's remarks on the video, there has been some speculation about the veracity of said video. I just want to give a heads up that some healthy skepticism should be used, with more information hopefully coming out to either validate or disprove the information provided by PV.
The mark's behavior in the follow-on video is so absurd it sets my Admiral Ackbar alarm off. If it IS all legit the fact that a tosser like this is directing pfizer research teams disturbs me more than the obvious knowledge that a major pharma company is doing serial passage research.
Well, one of the issues I'm finding is that there appears to be this Hollywood-esque assumption of who are hired at these companies.
As we argue that these companies are evil, nefarious businesses attempting to do harm on the world we give them this gloss of a super villain and assume that's how they should operate or behave.
But if anyone has worked in a lab they'd realize that scientists screw up A LOT. Even people assumed to be bright can make the most ridiculous mistakes. They can also be some of the most caddy people I've met, and that comes with a lot arrogance.
It's one of the reasons why I can't consider everything going on to be due to egregiously evil scientists because I'm aware that there are a ton of bad (i.e. bad at their job) scientists, and to be honest many of these companies, even if they are making billions, aren't hiring the best of the best out there.
So even as crazy as his antics are it also doesn't mean that this is not someone hired by Pfizer. It's not like we should expect fully stoic individuals, although I can also see that some may argue that the videos seem a bit performative and at the end of the day healthy skepticism is good to have for anything.
I was wondering too- but it appears that during the Twitter talk they went through all of the verifying information on Mr. Walker. And there was this also verifying various publications;
Thanks Charlotte! I saw them discuss the recent video on Tim Pool's podcast, which is where I saw the first PV video. It does seem likely that there is corroborating evidence with respect to his identity.
Interesting thought - passing it through humans! Maybe that is why so many are sick with odd things - rhinitus and coughs that won't go away, aches, pains..... they're spraying it on us and watching us react like ants... well... maybe not but since it seems we're living in someone's video game, anything goes.
Well, that point was more to the idea of what would constitute "gain-of-function". It seems highly unethical, but many studies have been done in immunocompromised individuals because they can be infected with SARS-COV2 for months and almost serves as an isolated case of watching the mutation in action.
In that case, would this be considered "gain-of-function" research? My guess would be that it could be considered GOF in some regard.
To everything else I would need evidence, but I also wouldn't be surprised if HIV or immunocompromised patients are used for other forms of research as well, which would raise ethical questions.
Maybe not Pfizer, or any pharmaceutical company really, but any research lab that would at least be willing to mess with the virus to conduct studies. Lots of speculation but not many answers right now. 🤷♂️
The fact that Omicron was glossed over should probably cause us to look back and reconsider its origins.
I also think this lends more credence to Brian Mowrey’s theory that this was purposefully released in Wuhan. What if one of the US labs had this first escape stateside and instead of dealing with the ensuing fallout- it was released in China?
Also, am i wrong in saying that Omicron wasn’t first found in South Africa? I thought it was found with 4 diplomats traveling to Botswana.... their country of origin was never identified...
I believe you are correct. The variant was first discovered in a few people from Botswana, however I believe the first recorded outbreak came about in South Africa, so that may have led to my incorrect comments.
It'd be interesting to consider if accidental or intentional release would be a way to drive vaccine sales, but it also would probably be a pretty messy way of going about doing it given that SARS-COV2 is already a widely circulating virus.
You'd have to assume that the newest variant, if constructed and somehow released, would be able to outcompete the current variant, or would not accrue mutations before the rollout of a vaccine.
Again, the whole approach just seems to messy to me, but it doesn't mean that things aren't going on that would be considered morally reprehensible.
Unless they made the vax at the same time.... who knows... seems there are no limits anymore on what the mad scientist will attempt. It's reprehensible that they would force injections but they did it anyway. I think they drive sales by ratcheting up the fear over each new supposed variant. It's curious that people don't realize the flu has continuing new variants .... and they didn't get into panic mode over it.
Upon lookin at some people's remarks on the video, there has been some speculation about the veracity of said video. I just want to give a heads up that some healthy skepticism should be used, with more information hopefully coming out to either validate or disprove the information provided by PV.
Ok, here’s a great substack doing the rundown on him
https://brianoshea.substack.com/p/who-is-jordon-trishton-walker
The mark's behavior in the follow-on video is so absurd it sets my Admiral Ackbar alarm off. If it IS all legit the fact that a tosser like this is directing pfizer research teams disturbs me more than the obvious knowledge that a major pharma company is doing serial passage research.
Well, one of the issues I'm finding is that there appears to be this Hollywood-esque assumption of who are hired at these companies.
As we argue that these companies are evil, nefarious businesses attempting to do harm on the world we give them this gloss of a super villain and assume that's how they should operate or behave.
But if anyone has worked in a lab they'd realize that scientists screw up A LOT. Even people assumed to be bright can make the most ridiculous mistakes. They can also be some of the most caddy people I've met, and that comes with a lot arrogance.
It's one of the reasons why I can't consider everything going on to be due to egregiously evil scientists because I'm aware that there are a ton of bad (i.e. bad at their job) scientists, and to be honest many of these companies, even if they are making billions, aren't hiring the best of the best out there.
So even as crazy as his antics are it also doesn't mean that this is not someone hired by Pfizer. It's not like we should expect fully stoic individuals, although I can also see that some may argue that the videos seem a bit performative and at the end of the day healthy skepticism is good to have for anything.
I was wondering too- but it appears that during the Twitter talk they went through all of the verifying information on Mr. Walker. And there was this also verifying various publications;
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/shocking-pfizer-director-physically
Thanks Charlotte! I saw them discuss the recent video on Tim Pool's podcast, which is where I saw the first PV video. It does seem likely that there is corroborating evidence with respect to his identity.
Interesting thought - passing it through humans! Maybe that is why so many are sick with odd things - rhinitus and coughs that won't go away, aches, pains..... they're spraying it on us and watching us react like ants... well... maybe not but since it seems we're living in someone's video game, anything goes.
Well, that point was more to the idea of what would constitute "gain-of-function". It seems highly unethical, but many studies have been done in immunocompromised individuals because they can be infected with SARS-COV2 for months and almost serves as an isolated case of watching the mutation in action.
In that case, would this be considered "gain-of-function" research? My guess would be that it could be considered GOF in some regard.
To everything else I would need evidence, but I also wouldn't be surprised if HIV or immunocompromised patients are used for other forms of research as well, which would raise ethical questions.
Ethics? What's that? ;(
PV good track record: yes
Skeptical: me too
I agree with you and the whole time I was watching the video I was thinking, did Pfzier make omicron?!
Maybe not Pfizer, or any pharmaceutical company really, but any research lab that would at least be willing to mess with the virus to conduct studies. Lots of speculation but not many answers right now. 🤷♂️
The fact that Omicron was glossed over should probably cause us to look back and reconsider its origins.
Good post. I would also like to see if this guy really works for Pfizer although I agree that PV usually gets it right.
Looks like pharma is gaming a lot of stuff to make more money ( sort of like the firefighter was also the arsonist at the scene of the crime)
https://mobile.twitter.com/CharlesRixey/status/1618412518841651201
I also think this lends more credence to Brian Mowrey’s theory that this was purposefully released in Wuhan. What if one of the US labs had this first escape stateside and instead of dealing with the ensuing fallout- it was released in China?
Or delivered through those military games we were playing right near Wuhan.
Russia has been apparently claiming that. Seems to fit, too.
Also, am i wrong in saying that Omicron wasn’t first found in South Africa? I thought it was found with 4 diplomats traveling to Botswana.... their country of origin was never identified...
I believe you are correct. The variant was first discovered in a few people from Botswana, however I believe the first recorded outbreak came about in South Africa, so that may have led to my incorrect comments.
I believe it was first discovered by SA and that one dr there rang the bell on it.
This is my favorite pinned article about omicron from Jan 2022
https://bprice.substack.com/p/lab-leak-20
It'd be interesting to consider if accidental or intentional release would be a way to drive vaccine sales, but it also would probably be a pretty messy way of going about doing it given that SARS-COV2 is already a widely circulating virus.
You'd have to assume that the newest variant, if constructed and somehow released, would be able to outcompete the current variant, or would not accrue mutations before the rollout of a vaccine.
Again, the whole approach just seems to messy to me, but it doesn't mean that things aren't going on that would be considered morally reprehensible.
Unless they made the vax at the same time.... who knows... seems there are no limits anymore on what the mad scientist will attempt. It's reprehensible that they would force injections but they did it anyway. I think they drive sales by ratcheting up the fear over each new supposed variant. It's curious that people don't realize the flu has continuing new variants .... and they didn't get into panic mode over it.
This seems like a limited hangout. They're trying to keep us in gain-of-function virusworld.