I prefer that Died Suddenly exists than not. If there's anything like modern society still around after this era, they will use this era as the new "never again." So any documentation that there was some awareness of "things are crazy" is the best we can probably hope to leave behind to show for ourselves.
It was a bit funny that they threw in the footage of at least two collapsers who are still alive, though.
No good can come of it. It can too easily be debunked by the "experts" as misinformation, even though like almost all calculated misinformation, it contains some truth.
It can potentially be used to discredit those who support it for legitimate reasons, while discussing its shortcomings through their writings. But these writings will not be read by such a large audience as this film is intended to reach.
In other words, it both reveals the clot issue truth, which may become undeniable, and makes the "cause" argument seem unprofessional.
Nov 29, 2022·edited Nov 29, 2022Liked by Modern Discontent
I did not share the video for a few different reasons, although I don't have much trouble with others sharing it if they are so inclined. Here are a few of the reasons I did not share it:
1) A shock factor is definitely there to grab attention, but with no explanation of whether it applies to those who have been infected or rather the shots being a catalyst, and/or which types of shots. Also with it being shocking, there's no suggested solutions to fixing the problem, testing for clots, or detoxing, when some protocols and tests already exist.
2) Simply describing the clots as fibrous seemed like more detailed information was missing. What is the actual composition of the clots, what other blood analysis was performed? Were any similar clots found in unvaxxed or absolutely none?
3) I think by broadcasting to the public, it could be easy for children to accidentally see. I don't think it's appropriate for children.
I can't remember if I saw erroneous information; however, there was something I saw questionable and I'm pretty sure incorrect in "Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion", but it did not stop me from sharing the film because the main points on their own were worthy to be seen and outweighed one questionable point.
There are many other videos/theories that with a little more work I could test for myself, but I haven't gotten around to it yet, so I can't form an opinion just yet.
As for whether I believe there was a real intent for all or some of the mRNA shots to actually contain mRNA, I lean toward there is effort there to. Reason being I see them wanting to experiment with the technology and see what happens. I see them wanting/testing to sequence mRNA to approximate the closest or exact spike protein, and seeing what the results would be of that exact or approximation in all sorts of people because all sorts of people could potentially benefit. However, the way it's been implemented has not been ethical.
In all, I appreciate the different angles taken to bring different topics to light. The fact checkers like to say "partly false" but I feel that means "mostly true" and there is some merit in those truths.
Stew Peters mysteriously showed up just as the pandemic started with a high-production Internet "TV show" poised to take over the vacuum of InfoWars, which had been booted off of almost every platform. Stew combines "news," a parody of MAGA culture, and a dash of Alex Jones in a slick and alarmist way...in fact, he's probably way more hyperbolic, hysterical, and crazy than even Alex Jones in terms of actual content...he just presents it all more calmly. In a nutshell, no, I don't trust him.
I watched most of Died Suddenly (and will write a review soon), but as soon as the production started with the Bigfoot crapola, I suspected that this documentary was designed to HURT the cause more than help. Also, did they actually get permission from Pink Floyd's record company to use Animals for the theme song? If they did, then that's suspicious in and of itself.
I prefer that Died Suddenly exists than not. If there's anything like modern society still around after this era, they will use this era as the new "never again." So any documentation that there was some awareness of "things are crazy" is the best we can probably hope to leave behind to show for ourselves.
It was a bit funny that they threw in the footage of at least two collapsers who are still alive, though.
Thanks for linking my post!
I put quite a bit of thought into the most diplomatic way to convey the point when I wrote that.
https://youtu.be/ANmkIIxCQCw
This video by DrBeen from 9 months ago illustrates the research papers which explain the process of abnormal clot formation.
No good can come of it. It can too easily be debunked by the "experts" as misinformation, even though like almost all calculated misinformation, it contains some truth.
It can potentially be used to discredit those who support it for legitimate reasons, while discussing its shortcomings through their writings. But these writings will not be read by such a large audience as this film is intended to reach.
In other words, it both reveals the clot issue truth, which may become undeniable, and makes the "cause" argument seem unprofessional.
I did not share the video for a few different reasons, although I don't have much trouble with others sharing it if they are so inclined. Here are a few of the reasons I did not share it:
1) A shock factor is definitely there to grab attention, but with no explanation of whether it applies to those who have been infected or rather the shots being a catalyst, and/or which types of shots. Also with it being shocking, there's no suggested solutions to fixing the problem, testing for clots, or detoxing, when some protocols and tests already exist.
2) Simply describing the clots as fibrous seemed like more detailed information was missing. What is the actual composition of the clots, what other blood analysis was performed? Were any similar clots found in unvaxxed or absolutely none?
3) I think by broadcasting to the public, it could be easy for children to accidentally see. I don't think it's appropriate for children.
I can't remember if I saw erroneous information; however, there was something I saw questionable and I'm pretty sure incorrect in "Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion", but it did not stop me from sharing the film because the main points on their own were worthy to be seen and outweighed one questionable point.
There are many other videos/theories that with a little more work I could test for myself, but I haven't gotten around to it yet, so I can't form an opinion just yet.
As for whether I believe there was a real intent for all or some of the mRNA shots to actually contain mRNA, I lean toward there is effort there to. Reason being I see them wanting to experiment with the technology and see what happens. I see them wanting/testing to sequence mRNA to approximate the closest or exact spike protein, and seeing what the results would be of that exact or approximation in all sorts of people because all sorts of people could potentially benefit. However, the way it's been implemented has not been ethical.
In all, I appreciate the different angles taken to bring different topics to light. The fact checkers like to say "partly false" but I feel that means "mostly true" and there is some merit in those truths.
Stew Peters mysteriously showed up just as the pandemic started with a high-production Internet "TV show" poised to take over the vacuum of InfoWars, which had been booted off of almost every platform. Stew combines "news," a parody of MAGA culture, and a dash of Alex Jones in a slick and alarmist way...in fact, he's probably way more hyperbolic, hysterical, and crazy than even Alex Jones in terms of actual content...he just presents it all more calmly. In a nutshell, no, I don't trust him.
I watched most of Died Suddenly (and will write a review soon), but as soon as the production started with the Bigfoot crapola, I suspected that this documentary was designed to HURT the cause more than help. Also, did they actually get permission from Pink Floyd's record company to use Animals for the theme song? If they did, then that's suspicious in and of itself.
I enjoyed (and mostly agreed) your take on this documentary. But most of all...Calamari Clot as a band name! Haha...that even beats MouseRat! 😉