Thanks for the shout-out. I'm pretty sure I put a ';)' on my comment you're referencing, and here's why:
The fact that the lipid nanoparticles and/or the spike protein they cause cells to produce doesn't stay put at or near the injection site has been known since early this past summer, when Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist from the University of Guelph in Canada revealed documentation that Pfizer had submitted to Japanese regulators. Obviously Pfizer was aware of it considerably earlier. Of course Dr. Bridle was quickly branded as an anti-vax conspiracy theorist.
Unfortunately much of the document is in Japanese, and I've yet to find a good translation, but scroll through it anyway. It seems that Japanese for "lipid nano particles" is "LNP".
Yupp, I think it was the same report that Bret Weinstein discussed with Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch. I took it with a bit of skepticism but the idea that several of these studies are coming out hinting at it should really be concerning, but I feel like it won't be mentioned.
And yes, I understood WHO, and mRNA! I guess we're almost there! I do understand the m/z so I guess they were analyzing the structure of some of the LNPs.
Oh thank you for that piece! I thought I've had my fill of condescension today but boy, was I wrong. It's strange that the entire website seems to have "antivax" related stuff. I hope they realize it's far easier to reach out to people if they didn't denigrate people in such a manner.
It is true though; prevalence of the antibodies doesn't indicate if it was either the lipid nanoparticle or the spike protein, but regardless it indicates either one is floating around and that itself should raise questions and be looked into.
I haven't! Appreciate it! I wish I saw some of these earlier when I was writing my nose piece. It's interesting that this piece didn't indicate the possible ramifications if they were to find antibodies outside of blood serum. What's interesting is they mentioned some people producing antibodies but being seronegative, which would possibly indicate an inoculum effect where they detected and produced antibodies but weren't fully infected.
Ironically enough, if plenty of evidence comes out that mucosal memory is being formed by the vaccines, that would work even more to argue against the protective nature of the vaccines.
Thanks for the shout-out. I'm pretty sure I put a ';)' on my comment you're referencing, and here's why:
The fact that the lipid nanoparticles and/or the spike protein they cause cells to produce doesn't stay put at or near the injection site has been known since early this past summer, when Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist from the University of Guelph in Canada revealed documentation that Pfizer had submitted to Japanese regulators. Obviously Pfizer was aware of it considerably earlier. Of course Dr. Bridle was quickly branded as an anti-vax conspiracy theorist.
Unfortunately much of the document is in Japanese, and I've yet to find a good translation, but scroll through it anyway. It seems that Japanese for "lipid nano particles" is "LNP".
https://www.docdroid.net/xq0Z8B0/pfizer-report-japanese-government-pdf
Yupp, I think it was the same report that Bret Weinstein discussed with Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch. I took it with a bit of skepticism but the idea that several of these studies are coming out hinting at it should really be concerning, but I feel like it won't be mentioned.
And yes, I understood WHO, and mRNA! I guess we're almost there! I do understand the m/z so I guess they were analyzing the structure of some of the LNPs.
Correct, that Darkhorse episode is one of the places the report in question came up, but there are references to it in various places as early as May.
Oh, and just to be fair, there's some "debunking" that claims it's all OK because 53% stays in the muscle:
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/covid-19-vaccines-are-going-to-sterilize-our-womenfolk-take-2/
Oh thank you for that piece! I thought I've had my fill of condescension today but boy, was I wrong. It's strange that the entire website seems to have "antivax" related stuff. I hope they realize it's far easier to reach out to people if they didn't denigrate people in such a manner.
It is true though; prevalence of the antibodies doesn't indicate if it was either the lipid nanoparticle or the spike protein, but regardless it indicates either one is floating around and that itself should raise questions and be looked into.
Oh yeah, that site is a piece of work. I'm surprised they don't openly run Pfizer ads.
Very interesting! This may also be of interest in case you haven't seen it: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34136730/
I haven't! Appreciate it! I wish I saw some of these earlier when I was writing my nose piece. It's interesting that this piece didn't indicate the possible ramifications if they were to find antibodies outside of blood serum. What's interesting is they mentioned some people producing antibodies but being seronegative, which would possibly indicate an inoculum effect where they detected and produced antibodies but weren't fully infected.
Ironically enough, if plenty of evidence comes out that mucosal memory is being formed by the vaccines, that would work even more to argue against the protective nature of the vaccines.