6 Comments

Brilliant. Thank you. 🙏

Expand full comment
author

As a heads up I included a correction- the spike protein does contain a lot of these secondary initiation sites, although Moderna's apparently doesn't contain any outside of the codons for methionine, which adds some credence to Promosome's lawsuit. The fact that Pfizer/BioNTech's vaccine still contains some of these regions is something that's worth looking into.

Expand full comment
Jun 8, 2023Liked by Modern Discontent

So fascinating. Mostly above my pay grade but what I understand is enthralling. And scary. And makes me glad I'm unvaxxed :)

Expand full comment
author

As a heads up, I did include a correction. It's hard to determine how much of this may translate into actual, real concerns, but it's rather interesting to think of. It may be worth investigating, or maybe it leads to nothing of concern. There's a lot of unknowns with these secondary initiation sites.

Expand full comment

"A lot of unknowns" means...they probably should have tested it for more than 6 months, right? ;)

Expand full comment

Excellent write-up, thank you.

So what would be interesting is to look at the positioning of these AUGs and potential cryptic peptides in relation to the fertility, autoimmune, and cancer-related peptides shown to be hidden in Spike protein, e.g. in: Kanduc D. 2021, From Anti-Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Immune Response to Cancer Onset via Molecular Mimicry and Cross-Reactivity, doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735590 and Dotan et al. 2021: Molecular mimicry between SARS-CoV-2 and the female reproductive system, doi: 10.1111/aji.13494.

Expand full comment