On the ground, we're seeing a worsening of longtime relatively stable Parkinsons and MS patients. Known patients show up with sudden new symptoms -- a common one is incontinence. Welcome to your new life -- in diapers. That's no small impact.
The thing is, because all of these patients already have a diagnosis, they are not being considered for Spike-based injuries. Rather, it is described as a sudden worsening of their already existing disease. Therefore injury databases and publications covering this phenomenon are totally missing.
Another problem for these patients with already having a diagnosis: Guillain Barre Syndrome, for instance, could also cause this worsening of symptoms that they are seeing and is a common complication of the Spike shot. An acute bout of GBS would be treated with a strong round of medications and have a chance of going away. To identify whether GBS is at play, you need to do a spinal tap and look at certain parameters. Parkinsons and MS patients get regular spinal taps, but that little test they would need to see the GBS parameters is not done, because they already have a diagnosis. To get the test, the doctors would simply need to check off one more box on the ordering form for the spinal fluid that they're already sending in. Instead, none of this is being done, patients are not identified as having a potentially treatable episode of GBS on top of their existing neurological issues, their existing medication regimes are slightly adjusted (but that won't cure the GBS), and they're stuck in diapers while trying to maintain their dignity as a functional adult.
This same situation is likely at play for patients in any department who are dealing with a chronic disease and have a preexisting diagnosis. Those people are the most vulnerable to Spike shot complications, and their data is totally absent. Instead we're relying on 16-year-old soccer players to collapse and let us know something's wrong.
So given a few things I've read there may be some reasons for this happening, although I won't be able to provide concrete answers but merely assumptions and hypotheses.
One thing is that there may be a concern that Parkinson's diagnoses may elevate in the coming years as was seen with the 1918 Spanish Flu outbreak and appears to occur with many different outbreaks in history. So viral infection itself may unmask or could possibly exacerbate symptoms of PD or parkinsonism.
PD also appears to be heavily influenced by inflammation and therefore there's something curious as to whether PD worsening in the case of the individual in the case report was due to spike or due to the high inflammatory response to the vaccine which may have led to the worsening of symptoms. Hence, it goes to the idea of the "insult threshold" in which the inflammation, immune, or cytotoxic effects of the vaccine push certain people over the threshold in which they then present with various adverse reactions or diseases.
I'll need to look at a timeline of some of my articles, but there was one which mentioned that there was a lot of fear over PD in the first few months of the pandemic which was then lessened in the following years, and it makes me curious if that meant that less surveillance was being done. That appears to be the similar situation you outlined above. It's a pretty big shame that not much else is being done for them. Do the doctors think the situation is a typical progression and therefore nothing else should be required? It doesn't seem to be the case if the symptoms of PD were well-managed before and now many other factors are arising.
There are many layers to what doctors think, what they say to who, and what the official statements end up being. Everyone is operating with subtlety. The official narrative that makes it to the patient is a worsening of pre-existing condition.
John Paul in Hidden in Complexity Substack pointed out another interesting aspect relevant to Parkinsons: when cells are rewired to produce Spike protein, that mRNA recipe apparently requires a substantial amount of essential amino acids that are otherwise required for neurotransmitters like Dopamine. So people who already have a deficiency in the functional neurons themselves now also have a substrate deficiency. Not to mention that neurons have receptors that are targeted by Spike, thus flagging them for immunological destruction once Spike has attached. And with either Adeno or LNP delivery vehicles, both of these were developed over decades to be neurotropic as a method of delivering gene etc. therapies to the brain. In Parkinson's patients, the straw that breaks the camel's back is Dopaminergic neurons. In other patients, some other group of cells may be the fragile target....
This is a really good point, we are missing a lot of injuries due to pre-existing conditions. I was telling a friend that the vaccine injection risks making any pre-existing condition worse via increased inflammation and/or reduced oxygen via rouleaux formation or capillary blood clotting. I have two very active friends in their late sixties with pre-existing arthritis who've had severe pain these last two winters since taking multiple injections. One now is on anti autoimmune medication and the other plans to move to the desert this spring because their pain is so bad. Neither will consider the effect of the shot and believe it's just a worsening of the arthritis they already had. I've treated a lot of people with arthritis and haven't seen such a significant change between one winter to the next, the worsening usually comes on more gradually. I have another friend on her 50s who developed chest pain after her third shot but since she had occasional heart arrhythmia before, she blames it on her "bad heart" (even though she beat a treadmill test 6 years ago). My aunt who came out of breast cancer remission with full-blown bone cancer doesn't know the shot could be involved. At least my other friend with a previous CABG x 3 knew her new onset arrhythmia was from the shot. My heart breaks for them, and the cognitive dissonance has taken some getting used to.
That's one of the issues in their assumption that the vaccines are safe for everyone. Nothing is safe for everyone, and it's worth figuring out who it may be unsafe for before dishing out a therapeutic in the millions. I suspect that some genetic predisposition as well as underlying factors may be at play here (just forming a hypothesis). The series on a possible hypothesis was intended to provide some context with respect to that but I'll return to that probably after this series.
I do hope your friends and aunt get better. It's a serious issue that more people aren't looking into what could be happening to people.
Yeah, same here. I know about 20 people who have side effects, some severe. Several sudden heart attack deaths, a man in this late 40s with a stroke, chest pain on airline flights, a cancer death, erectile problems, shingles. It's heartbreaking isn't it? If I even suggest the vaccine everyone waves it off, it's too hard for them to even consider. I'm glad you had one person relieved to hear you implicate the vaccine injection. 👍🏽
How many are dying from shot but blamed on other things they have? Without an autopsy and looking for spike protein they would never know the reason for death!
On the ground, we're seeing a worsening of longtime relatively stable Parkinsons and MS patients. Known patients show up with sudden new symptoms -- a common one is incontinence. Welcome to your new life -- in diapers. That's no small impact.
The thing is, because all of these patients already have a diagnosis, they are not being considered for Spike-based injuries. Rather, it is described as a sudden worsening of their already existing disease. Therefore injury databases and publications covering this phenomenon are totally missing.
Another problem for these patients with already having a diagnosis: Guillain Barre Syndrome, for instance, could also cause this worsening of symptoms that they are seeing and is a common complication of the Spike shot. An acute bout of GBS would be treated with a strong round of medications and have a chance of going away. To identify whether GBS is at play, you need to do a spinal tap and look at certain parameters. Parkinsons and MS patients get regular spinal taps, but that little test they would need to see the GBS parameters is not done, because they already have a diagnosis. To get the test, the doctors would simply need to check off one more box on the ordering form for the spinal fluid that they're already sending in. Instead, none of this is being done, patients are not identified as having a potentially treatable episode of GBS on top of their existing neurological issues, their existing medication regimes are slightly adjusted (but that won't cure the GBS), and they're stuck in diapers while trying to maintain their dignity as a functional adult.
This same situation is likely at play for patients in any department who are dealing with a chronic disease and have a preexisting diagnosis. Those people are the most vulnerable to Spike shot complications, and their data is totally absent. Instead we're relying on 16-year-old soccer players to collapse and let us know something's wrong.
Thank you for sharing your perspective Bird.
So given a few things I've read there may be some reasons for this happening, although I won't be able to provide concrete answers but merely assumptions and hypotheses.
One thing is that there may be a concern that Parkinson's diagnoses may elevate in the coming years as was seen with the 1918 Spanish Flu outbreak and appears to occur with many different outbreaks in history. So viral infection itself may unmask or could possibly exacerbate symptoms of PD or parkinsonism.
PD also appears to be heavily influenced by inflammation and therefore there's something curious as to whether PD worsening in the case of the individual in the case report was due to spike or due to the high inflammatory response to the vaccine which may have led to the worsening of symptoms. Hence, it goes to the idea of the "insult threshold" in which the inflammation, immune, or cytotoxic effects of the vaccine push certain people over the threshold in which they then present with various adverse reactions or diseases.
I'll need to look at a timeline of some of my articles, but there was one which mentioned that there was a lot of fear over PD in the first few months of the pandemic which was then lessened in the following years, and it makes me curious if that meant that less surveillance was being done. That appears to be the similar situation you outlined above. It's a pretty big shame that not much else is being done for them. Do the doctors think the situation is a typical progression and therefore nothing else should be required? It doesn't seem to be the case if the symptoms of PD were well-managed before and now many other factors are arising.
There are many layers to what doctors think, what they say to who, and what the official statements end up being. Everyone is operating with subtlety. The official narrative that makes it to the patient is a worsening of pre-existing condition.
John Paul in Hidden in Complexity Substack pointed out another interesting aspect relevant to Parkinsons: when cells are rewired to produce Spike protein, that mRNA recipe apparently requires a substantial amount of essential amino acids that are otherwise required for neurotransmitters like Dopamine. So people who already have a deficiency in the functional neurons themselves now also have a substrate deficiency. Not to mention that neurons have receptors that are targeted by Spike, thus flagging them for immunological destruction once Spike has attached. And with either Adeno or LNP delivery vehicles, both of these were developed over decades to be neurotropic as a method of delivering gene etc. therapies to the brain. In Parkinson's patients, the straw that breaks the camel's back is Dopaminergic neurons. In other patients, some other group of cells may be the fragile target....
This is a really good point, we are missing a lot of injuries due to pre-existing conditions. I was telling a friend that the vaccine injection risks making any pre-existing condition worse via increased inflammation and/or reduced oxygen via rouleaux formation or capillary blood clotting. I have two very active friends in their late sixties with pre-existing arthritis who've had severe pain these last two winters since taking multiple injections. One now is on anti autoimmune medication and the other plans to move to the desert this spring because their pain is so bad. Neither will consider the effect of the shot and believe it's just a worsening of the arthritis they already had. I've treated a lot of people with arthritis and haven't seen such a significant change between one winter to the next, the worsening usually comes on more gradually. I have another friend on her 50s who developed chest pain after her third shot but since she had occasional heart arrhythmia before, she blames it on her "bad heart" (even though she beat a treadmill test 6 years ago). My aunt who came out of breast cancer remission with full-blown bone cancer doesn't know the shot could be involved. At least my other friend with a previous CABG x 3 knew her new onset arrhythmia was from the shot. My heart breaks for them, and the cognitive dissonance has taken some getting used to.
Take good care. 🙏❤️
That's one of the issues in their assumption that the vaccines are safe for everyone. Nothing is safe for everyone, and it's worth figuring out who it may be unsafe for before dishing out a therapeutic in the millions. I suspect that some genetic predisposition as well as underlying factors may be at play here (just forming a hypothesis). The series on a possible hypothesis was intended to provide some context with respect to that but I'll return to that probably after this series.
I do hope your friends and aunt get better. It's a serious issue that more people aren't looking into what could be happening to people.
Yeah, same here. I know about 20 people who have side effects, some severe. Several sudden heart attack deaths, a man in this late 40s with a stroke, chest pain on airline flights, a cancer death, erectile problems, shingles. It's heartbreaking isn't it? If I even suggest the vaccine everyone waves it off, it's too hard for them to even consider. I'm glad you had one person relieved to hear you implicate the vaccine injection. 👍🏽
How many are dying from shot but blamed on other things they have? Without an autopsy and looking for spike protein they would never know the reason for death!