1 Comment

More from Modern Discontent on that not-ready-for-primetime research supposedly showing integration of COVID jab material into human cellular DNA obtained from blood samples.

(I initially had seen insufficient procedural explanation, and insufficient alignment to make any claims, and therefore disregarded the conclusion of DNA integration. And this was without detailed knowledge of the analytical techniques currently used in such research.)

Modern Discontent tells you more about the analytical alternatives.

Should people keep looking for this DNA integration? Yes, because it's very possible, with the augmented delivery system, to get the bunch of DNA adulterants existing in the jabs into the cell and nucleus. (Never forget that the idea of RNA jabs was proposed as the "safer" alternative to circumvent genetic integration.)

We need independent analysts such as Modern Discontent to sift through ongoing research to discern which conclusions are well based in the data. Therefore, consider the power of the $ubstack $ubscription$ for keeping a watchful eye on the world of medical research and everything else.

Expand full comment