Biden is weak? No, Biden is a CORRUPT psychopath and crazy like a fox and hell bent on killing Zelensky for turning over recordings and documents proving Biden and his cronies - Pelosi, Kerry, Romney, Obama, Clinton, and other were taking bribes and using Ukraine for money laundering.
Here’s the Ukrainian press conference wher they release the documents and recordings on the Biden Crime Family:
Biden is on the take, he’s always been in the take. They all have been in the take.
Biden took $1.5 billion or a lot more from China
Biden left $85 billion in Afghanistan for who? The Taliban to give to China or who else? What is Biden’s kickback? Remember 10% for the ‘big guy’ but now the ‘big guy’ is president, surely he gets a hell of a lot more than 10%.
How much did Biden take from Russia?
How much will Biden get from Russia by shutting down US pipelines, shutting down the Israel-Cyrpus-Europe pipeline, ok’ing the Nordstream pipeline, not shutting down energy from Russia after Russia invaded Ukraine and not reopening US pipelines and guess what?
in addition to billions in kickbacks from Russia, Putin invades Ukraine with Biden’s full consent and that also serves as Biden’s payback to the Ukrainians for double crossing Biden and working with Trump and exposing their dealings of Biden, Kerry, Pelosi, Romney, Obama, Clinton and their children and cronies and every other dirty Democrat and RINO involved?
Putin is a WEF member, even though WEF took down his bio, Putin wants to implement Klaus Schwab’s fourth industrial Revolution. Putin could have gotten rid of Schwab and Soros any time he wanted and he hasn’t.
This is the simplest reason and the most likely reason of all.
Remember Zelensky made a point of publicly burning records on Day 1 - that’s exactly what Biden and his cabal wanted to see. They are making Zelensky beg for his life and his families’ life. Zelensky wouldn’t take the US offer to fly him out because the US would make sure he was killed in flight - very easy to arrange.
In the end all the worlds’ megalomaniacs get exactly what they want and Ukrainians are screwed just like all of the little people world wide are screwed by the Globalist WEF Kakistocracy.
Pawsative I feel like we may agree on a lot more than we disagree. There's a lot with this administration that I am deeply concerned about, and the kickbacks received were never addressed. Also, taking into account that the Hunter laptop story was censored until after the election reeks of foul play.
However, as it comes to Ukraine, there is so much about this geopolitical conflict that I don't know about, to the point where I would be doing more than speculating and likely BS'ing. At that point I'd rather not provide my own perspectives because I have none to give.
That doesn't mean there's a lot of things going on within this administration and many other avenues of government that should be overlooked, but as it relates to this topic specifically I would rather abstain than work in conjecture.
Hopefully that at least provides some insight into why I wrote this post.
This is all so, so true. I, like you, feel so ill-informed about this conflict (loved the Friends clip BTW). I think people often attribute my silence on a topic as indifference while they are joining in the hysteria. I really don’t know what to think, therefore I have nothing to contribute to the conversation. There are ALWAYS two sides of the story and the clip from Robert Gouveia was great - these short seemingly horrific videos only show part of the story - the media can easily manipulate anything to fit the agenda. I can easily see my own bias against Russia as I grew up in the 80’s during the Cold War - but what do I know about Ukraine - it used to be part of the Soviet Union (sadly that’s about it). Nonetheless, thank you for your pearls of wisdom - we all need to take this advice to heart.
I didn't set it up right, but my Friends clip was to point out how people may try so hard to show that they're not ignorant that it may end up backfiring on them!
I think we should be allowed to say "I don't know". These types of things have now become a method for people to show how "in the know" they are of these things even if they may not know anything about the topic. More of a way to "fake it till you make it" within certain groups I suppose.
We definitely need to understand there are different perspectives and the truth lies somewhere where they intersect and to take that in mind. It's a difficult thing to do something but it doesn't mean people shouldn't try!
Hopefully people will take this as a way to know that they don't need to weigh in on everything and it's sometimes okay to sit back.
It's weird, because it feels like we're at a point where you apparently can't show some level of naivety or ignorance. I think a lot of people should embrace the idea that there are things they don't know. It's not a bad thing to be aware of one's ignorance, at least that's what I think!
We should at least be able to have good-faith discussions with one another, but that tends not to be the case. It's probably the fault of online discourse if anything else really.
I don’t think it’s just online stuff — I have many friends and family who never read or participate in online discussions and I daren’t mention covid, vax, and now Russia et al.
Nice post! I had the opportunity to live in Brazil for a year, fifty years ago. None of the news about Brazil that was reported in the US media of the time (1970 -71) had much relevance to the realities I saw and experienced while there. That was when I really became skeptical of the media, (well Vietnam made a horses ass of the media as well. Which reminds me that the government and MSM have lied about every war we've been in for my lifetime. Skeptical am I, and my heart goes out to those suffering the consequences.
It's honestly quite strange to see how many people take the media for their word. You'd think several decades of the media coverage may wake people up to the idea that they aren't being entirely obvious. Add COVID on top of that and I find it very difficult to take anything the media says as defensible. It's quite interesting how stepping away and going someplace else provides for some new perspective and the ability to see things in a new light.
And yes, regardless of what we think it should not be understated that there are plenty of tragedies occurring because of the conflict and so we should think about those victims.
Robert Malone had a great post on propaganda and corporatism yesterday https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/propaganda-corporatism-and-the-hidden which I appreciated from the perspective of what and how it happens. I grew up with Walter Cronkite announcing "and that's the way the world is, today March 1st" etc. and we thought he knew what he was talking about
The media serves two primary purposes:a way to sell advertising, and political agendas/points of view. The "entertainment" part of media serves to sell both. The fear mongering serves both.
In the meantime, I spend time in the garden the ocean, and watch the natural world go by. There's where "truth" lies.
I'll make sure to read it again. I think I missed that post but it's become quite common knowledge that the media bases their news in a way that serves their best interests. There's a reason why the phrase "if it bleeds it leads" has been mentioned quite often to refer to the media.
It doesn't mean everything they report is wrong, but it certainly means that far more people should be discerning viewers of the news. It's quite astonishing how many people just take everything at face value.
Paul, you sound like you are living a life worth living. All the best to you!
It's an interesting perspective that there's been a sudden pivot. I did see Coffee and COVID's Substack post today that somewhat inspired this post in which he stated that this occurring before the State of the Union will somehow bump up Biden's numbers. I don't want to ascribe malice, but it is interesting that things tend to "fall into place" in that regard. Nonetheless, I will remain skeptical until I see more information.
I have definitely seen and heart of them, especially on Jimmy Dore's show! I believe Max has a book that I've seen many people reference so I'll try checking them out.
At the end of the day it is really scouting out who will engage in open dialogue or who will engage in ad hominem attacks. It's one of the reasons why I try avoiding Twitter since it feels like it's just so much easier to attack people than it is to refute or discuss any of the claims being made.
LOL. He isn’t presenting it from the viewpoint of the American people and Grabar cites sources. Zinn took Marxist propaganda written by others and put it together in a book. And I’ve read both. Many others have debunked Zinn.
If you are interested in History look for unbiased accounts that are well researched.
The writings of Thomas Sowell is a great place to start.
Did you forget Biden is President?
Biden is weak? No, Biden is a CORRUPT psychopath and crazy like a fox and hell bent on killing Zelensky for turning over recordings and documents proving Biden and his cronies - Pelosi, Kerry, Romney, Obama, Clinton, and other were taking bribes and using Ukraine for money laundering.
Here’s the Ukrainian press conference wher they release the documents and recordings on the Biden Crime Family:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lcEw4wNEhaJ6/
Biden is on the take, he’s always been in the take. They all have been in the take.
Biden took $1.5 billion or a lot more from China
Biden left $85 billion in Afghanistan for who? The Taliban to give to China or who else? What is Biden’s kickback? Remember 10% for the ‘big guy’ but now the ‘big guy’ is president, surely he gets a hell of a lot more than 10%.
How much did Biden take from Russia?
How much will Biden get from Russia by shutting down US pipelines, shutting down the Israel-Cyrpus-Europe pipeline, ok’ing the Nordstream pipeline, not shutting down energy from Russia after Russia invaded Ukraine and not reopening US pipelines and guess what?
in addition to billions in kickbacks from Russia, Putin invades Ukraine with Biden’s full consent and that also serves as Biden’s payback to the Ukrainians for double crossing Biden and working with Trump and exposing their dealings of Biden, Kerry, Pelosi, Romney, Obama, Clinton and their children and cronies and every other dirty Democrat and RINO involved?
Putin is a WEF member, even though WEF took down his bio, Putin wants to implement Klaus Schwab’s fourth industrial Revolution. Putin could have gotten rid of Schwab and Soros any time he wanted and he hasn’t.
This is the simplest reason and the most likely reason of all.
Remember Zelensky made a point of publicly burning records on Day 1 - that’s exactly what Biden and his cabal wanted to see. They are making Zelensky beg for his life and his families’ life. Zelensky wouldn’t take the US offer to fly him out because the US would make sure he was killed in flight - very easy to arrange.
In the end all the worlds’ megalomaniacs get exactly what they want and Ukrainians are screwed just like all of the little people world wide are screwed by the Globalist WEF Kakistocracy.
Pawsative I feel like we may agree on a lot more than we disagree. There's a lot with this administration that I am deeply concerned about, and the kickbacks received were never addressed. Also, taking into account that the Hunter laptop story was censored until after the election reeks of foul play.
However, as it comes to Ukraine, there is so much about this geopolitical conflict that I don't know about, to the point where I would be doing more than speculating and likely BS'ing. At that point I'd rather not provide my own perspectives because I have none to give.
That doesn't mean there's a lot of things going on within this administration and many other avenues of government that should be overlooked, but as it relates to this topic specifically I would rather abstain than work in conjecture.
Hopefully that at least provides some insight into why I wrote this post.
Thanks for your reply.
This is all so, so true. I, like you, feel so ill-informed about this conflict (loved the Friends clip BTW). I think people often attribute my silence on a topic as indifference while they are joining in the hysteria. I really don’t know what to think, therefore I have nothing to contribute to the conversation. There are ALWAYS two sides of the story and the clip from Robert Gouveia was great - these short seemingly horrific videos only show part of the story - the media can easily manipulate anything to fit the agenda. I can easily see my own bias against Russia as I grew up in the 80’s during the Cold War - but what do I know about Ukraine - it used to be part of the Soviet Union (sadly that’s about it). Nonetheless, thank you for your pearls of wisdom - we all need to take this advice to heart.
I didn't set it up right, but my Friends clip was to point out how people may try so hard to show that they're not ignorant that it may end up backfiring on them!
I think we should be allowed to say "I don't know". These types of things have now become a method for people to show how "in the know" they are of these things even if they may not know anything about the topic. More of a way to "fake it till you make it" within certain groups I suppose.
We definitely need to understand there are different perspectives and the truth lies somewhere where they intersect and to take that in mind. It's a difficult thing to do something but it doesn't mean people shouldn't try!
Hopefully people will take this as a way to know that they don't need to weigh in on everything and it's sometimes okay to sit back.
RESPECT!!!! I often think...I can't believe how much I DON'T know. Thanks for articulate expression of that idea.
It's weird, because it feels like we're at a point where you apparently can't show some level of naivety or ignorance. I think a lot of people should embrace the idea that there are things they don't know. It's not a bad thing to be aware of one's ignorance, at least that's what I think!
Very well stated. You’ve said some of the things that drive me crazy but haven't been able to articulate. Can’t we all agree??!!
We should at least be able to have good-faith discussions with one another, but that tends not to be the case. It's probably the fault of online discourse if anything else really.
I don’t think it’s just online stuff — I have many friends and family who never read or participate in online discussions and I daren’t mention covid, vax, and now Russia et al.
Nice post! I had the opportunity to live in Brazil for a year, fifty years ago. None of the news about Brazil that was reported in the US media of the time (1970 -71) had much relevance to the realities I saw and experienced while there. That was when I really became skeptical of the media, (well Vietnam made a horses ass of the media as well. Which reminds me that the government and MSM have lied about every war we've been in for my lifetime. Skeptical am I, and my heart goes out to those suffering the consequences.
Aloha Paul
It's honestly quite strange to see how many people take the media for their word. You'd think several decades of the media coverage may wake people up to the idea that they aren't being entirely obvious. Add COVID on top of that and I find it very difficult to take anything the media says as defensible. It's quite interesting how stepping away and going someplace else provides for some new perspective and the ability to see things in a new light.
And yes, regardless of what we think it should not be understated that there are plenty of tragedies occurring because of the conflict and so we should think about those victims.
Robert Malone had a great post on propaganda and corporatism yesterday https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/propaganda-corporatism-and-the-hidden which I appreciated from the perspective of what and how it happens. I grew up with Walter Cronkite announcing "and that's the way the world is, today March 1st" etc. and we thought he knew what he was talking about
The media serves two primary purposes:a way to sell advertising, and political agendas/points of view. The "entertainment" part of media serves to sell both. The fear mongering serves both.
In the meantime, I spend time in the garden the ocean, and watch the natural world go by. There's where "truth" lies.
Aloha
I'll make sure to read it again. I think I missed that post but it's become quite common knowledge that the media bases their news in a way that serves their best interests. There's a reason why the phrase "if it bleeds it leads" has been mentioned quite often to refer to the media.
It doesn't mean everything they report is wrong, but it certainly means that far more people should be discerning viewers of the news. It's quite astonishing how many people just take everything at face value.
Paul, you sound like you are living a life worth living. All the best to you!
And all the best too you as well.
Aloha
It's an interesting perspective that there's been a sudden pivot. I did see Coffee and COVID's Substack post today that somewhat inspired this post in which he stated that this occurring before the State of the Union will somehow bump up Biden's numbers. I don't want to ascribe malice, but it is interesting that things tend to "fall into place" in that regard. Nonetheless, I will remain skeptical until I see more information.
I have definitely seen and heart of them, especially on Jimmy Dore's show! I believe Max has a book that I've seen many people reference so I'll try checking them out.
At the end of the day it is really scouting out who will engage in open dialogue or who will engage in ad hominem attacks. It's one of the reasons why I try avoiding Twitter since it feels like it's just so much easier to attack people than it is to refute or discuss any of the claims being made.
Red pilled by Howard Zinn? Read Howard Zin Debunked. Zinn compiled Marxist propaganda and turned it in to a book. Zinn was an American hating leftist.
https://www.theahi.org/ahis-mary-grabar-why-i-wrote-debunking-howard-zinn/
LOL. He isn’t presenting it from the viewpoint of the American people and Grabar cites sources. Zinn took Marxist propaganda written by others and put it together in a book. And I’ve read both. Many others have debunked Zinn.
If you are interested in History look for unbiased accounts that are well researched.
The writings of Thomas Sowell is a great place to start.
Excellent reply on media literacy! 👍🏼