"Limitations include the inability to include an unvaccinated control group due to the ATAGI recommendation for all children aged 5 to 11 years to receive the BNT162b2 vaccine. It was unethical to randomise children into an unvaccinated, placebo or delayed vaccination group".
No. What was "unethical" was to NOT have a placebo group.
Each child has a unique immune system, ergo each child will react in an individual way. What nobody can possibly tell, unless they have a crystal ball! Is how and when any problem could arise and to the severity. It could be a ticking time bomb.
The humble researcher admits that we are just at the beginning phase of discovery when it comes to the immune system. Fauci and clowns know this. Unfortunately, egos abound in this arena. This makes me inclined to believe this was done with malice aforethought. (sub does not recognize that last word :|)
"Lazy" as a strategy may be decent for the weak and old. A matter of timeline and ROI...live for a few more years and backfire the system. Or, live better. Anyways, the juice is clearly not for all of us.
"Limitations include the inability to include an unvaccinated control group due to the ATAGI recommendation for all children aged 5 to 11 years to receive the BNT162b2 vaccine. It was unethical to randomise children into an unvaccinated, placebo or delayed vaccination group".
No. What was "unethical" was to NOT have a placebo group.
When rebound infections were first acknowledged among Paxlovid patients I had the same thought, that the inoculations might be a contributing factor.
https://newsletter.allfactsmatter.us/p/cdc-issues-paxlovid-warning-but-what
Each child has a unique immune system, ergo each child will react in an individual way. What nobody can possibly tell, unless they have a crystal ball! Is how and when any problem could arise and to the severity. It could be a ticking time bomb.
The humble researcher admits that we are just at the beginning phase of discovery when it comes to the immune system. Fauci and clowns know this. Unfortunately, egos abound in this arena. This makes me inclined to believe this was done with malice aforethought. (sub does not recognize that last word :|)
"Lazy" as a strategy may be decent for the weak and old. A matter of timeline and ROI...live for a few more years and backfire the system. Or, live better. Anyways, the juice is clearly not for all of us.
I feel ya. https://substack.com/@peasandloving/note/c-39377643?utm_source=notes-share-action&r=1nj48s