In search of answers to vaccine adverse reactions.
An example of someone injured by the adenoviral vaccines, who is on the search for answers and treatments.
I’ve sporadically made it known that I’ve grown a bit frustrated with how stagnant the search for answers related to vaccine adverse reactions has become. Rather than seeing people try to piece information together and get closer to some form of consilience, I’m seeing many posts that just conclude with the banal phrase of “vaccines bad”.
At this point such an argument is completely redundant. We know that the vaccines have harmed many people. We should not be looking at studies from a lens of proclaiming the vaccines are bad since it doesn’t add much to figuring out what’s happening.
I won’t speak for anyone but myself, but I won’t deny that this may be a growing trend.
So far we still don’t have clear explanations for these adverse reactions, or why they the symptoms are so widespread.
Just a few days ago I reported on the fact that those who suffered VITT from the adenoviral-vector vaccines may still suffer long-term complications.
As of now, many of the adenoviral-vector vaccines have been removed from widespread use, and it appears that J&J may actually no longer be available in the US as the last stocks of this vaccine appear to have expired on May 7th, as reported by Stephanie Brail.
Although this may seem great, the full removal of these vaccines will unfortunately mean that there’s no incentive to investigate VITT or other adenoviral-related adverse reactions.
There’s already apparent evidence that researchers aren’t bothering with investigating VITT, as even now the main hypothesis that has gained traction via an anti-PF4 antibody-mediated response akin to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia has still yet to be verified/falsified through robust testing.
Most people have forgotten about the blood-clot issues as well, and this lack of awareness and pressure on the FDA and CDC may mean that people will never get any answers to their complications, including possible treatments.
As of now, there still is much left to figure out, and in order to do so there needs to be more curiosity, more inquiry, and an approach that employs critical thinking, rather than falling back on superficial narratives.
In Thursday’s post reader Crosscat provided a rather timely example of just that- someone who is attempting to search for the truth and digging deep into the science.
Crosscat provided a link to a recent Dr. Been livestream in which he discusses complications and tests that a vaccine injured individual was undergoing.
In this case, a woman named Michelle Zimmerman who received the J&J adenoviral vaccine began experiencing complications in early 2021, leading her to seek out what exactly is causing her prolonged, debilitating symptoms.
Her issues vary, including possible mitochondrial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivation and microclotting, and hypoxia under certain circumstances, among many other complications. It appears that Michelle is still considered medically disabled and is not cleared to either drive or work.
Because of her symptoms, Michelle began to search for answers to what is happening to her.
I haven’t looked through the entire interview in detail, but it’s apparent that Michelle has taken an extremely proactive approach in figuring out what has happened to her.
Michelle’s curiosity, and her yearning to find answers has led her to look extensively into the literature, reach out to specialists, and attempt to piece together whatever information that she could.
That is not to say that those who have been injured aren’t seeking out answers to their injuries. Rather, that the process of sensemaking can be challenging, and when bombarded with all forms of information it can become difficult to piece together things that are relevant and recognize things that are noise.
It’s quite clear that Michelle understands the different tests she is receiving, and is trying to make connections wherever possible.
The interview is an hour long, but I think it helps to serve as an example of how to approach research. When confronted with information, we should seek out information to further contextualize what we are presented with. We should also strive to either corroborate or falsify the information we have come across in a nuanced manner.
I think there’s a lot to learn from Michelle’s approach, and hopefully more people endeavor to become more educated and more informed science readers.
Substack is my main source of income and all support helps to support me in my daily life. If you enjoyed this post and other works please consider supporting me through a paid Substack subscription or through my Ko-fi. Any bit helps, and it encourages independent creators and journalists such as myself to provide work outside of the mainstream narrative.
What is arguably as concerning as the cause or causes of the unprecedented number of COVID "vaccine" adverse effects is the dismal failure of public health agencies to investigate this extrememly concerning global phenomenon.
When the reckoning comes, as it surely must, those elected specifically to guard the public against the historical rapaciousness and criminal behavior of the pharmaceutical industry must not be permitted to escape just retribution for their blatant and ongoing dereliction of duty.
The Zimmerman interview is fascinating given the extent of her injury, her knowledge base and her ability to analyze the data.